Skip to main content
carbonGeneral Methodologyv2.1

VCH Red River Valley - Soil Carbon

DV-e8adcf

#182of 261 in Soil carbon

4.2/ 10
Integrity
4.8
Transparency
3.2
Claim Safety
4.2
Documentation
4.2

Audit Analysis

The VCH Red River Valley soil carbon project is at validation stage with a 20% buffer pool and a combined additionality test, but suffers from a complete absence of leakage treatment, an unverified project-specific baseline, and three material findings flagging measurement-consistency risks in calcareous soils. No monitoring data, verified ERR figure, or FNRB methodology is available, leaving the 6,791 claimed ERR entirely uncorroborated. The project shows early-stage promise but significant gaps in both methodological rigor and data transparency.

Red Flags

  • Leakage is entirely unaddressed (no deduction, no justification) in a soil carbon project where supply-chain and land-use-change leakage pathways are well established
  • Three material findings in the validation report flag risks of SOC/SIC confusion in calcareous soils and year-to-year measurement inconsistency, with four corrective actions still outstanding
  • No verified ERR figure exists; the 6,791 claimed ERR is uncorroborated by any monitoring or verification data
  • Carbon content was not independently tested and storage was not independently verified, weakening the physical basis of the credit claim

Credit Vintages

Issuance data not yet available — check back soon.

Risk Indicators

Additionality

Combined test present; VVB confirmation not explicitly documented

Permanence

20% buffer pool present; reversal events not stated; no LCA

Leakage

No leakage deduction or justification in a soil carbon project

Baseline

Project-specific baseline; no reassessment date stated

Safeguards

Safeguards and benefit sharing mentioned; FPIC and grievance mechanism not documented

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status both unstated; dual-channel risk not excluded

Where to buy

Marketplaces

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-09-03General Methodology v2.1

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents