VPA 106 - GHG Emission Reduction through use of Bondhu Chula (Improved Cook Stoves) in Bangladesh
GS-3788 ↗ · current registry ID: GS11853
#332of 1329 in Industrial#54of 121 in Bangladesh#542of 1801 in Gold Standard (GS)
Audit Analysis
A Gold Standard cookstove VPA in Bangladesh with a VVB-confirmed combined additionality test and a quantified 5% leakage deduction, but undermined by the absence of a buffer pool, a project-specific baseline with no reassessment record, a significant FPIC contradiction between the validation and verification reports, and an extensive list of corrective actions that signal documentation weaknesses. The verified usage rate (0.9833) exceeds the conservative assumption (0.9), which is reassuring, yet the ERR figure discrepancy between the monitoring and verification reports and the lack of an ex-ante lifetime estimate limit confidence in the credit volume.
Red Flags
- No buffer pool or permanence mechanism is documented for a project where stoves can be replaced by conventional cookstoves, creating unaddressed reversal risk over the 15-year crediting period.
- FPIC status is contradictory: the validation report (2023) states FPIC was conducted, while the more recent verification report (2024) states it was not — a material safeguards gap for a project targeting low-income households in Bangladesh.
- The ERR figure in the monitoring report (352,957 tCO₂e, dated 2023-09-25) differs materially from the verification report (523,571 tCO₂e, dated 2024-08-05), and no ex-ante lifetime estimate is available to benchmark the pro-rata expectation.
- Eighteen or more corrective actions were required across the verification and validation processes, including unresolved questions about stakeholder consultation, grievance mechanism implementation, and double-counting prevention for stove serial numbers.
Credit Vintages Exhausted
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 36 | 36 | 0 | |
| 2023 | 68 | 68 | 0 | |
| Total | 104 | 104 | 0 |
Risk Indicators
Combined test, VVB-confirmed
mixed evidence / unresolved risk
5% quantified deduction
Project-specific, no reassessment date
FPIC contradiction; grievance mechanism present
CCP eligible; CORSIA not stated
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →