VPA 175 EcoZoom Improved Stove Programme, Uganda
GS-1517 ↗ · current registry ID: GS7345
#940of 1329 in Industrial#120of 163 in Uganda#1368of 1801 in Gold Standard (GS)
Audit Analysis
The EcoZoom Improved Stove Programme in Uganda is a Gold Standard cookstove project with a combined additionality test and a project-specific baseline reassessed in 2024, but it is undermined by a 0% leakage deduction justified only as 'deemed negligible' (contradicted by the PDD's 5% quantified figure), the absence of a buffer pool, and a Kitchen Performance Test that was not conducted in the current monitoring period. Eleven cross-document contradictions—including conflicting additionality verification status, fNRB methodology, and ERR figures—erode confidence in the data. The extensive list of corrective actions and further-assessment-required items signals ongoing documentation and methodology-compliance gaps.
Red Flags
- Kitchen Performance Test (KPT) was not conducted in the current monitoring period; results from a prior period (MP2) were applied, weakening the efficiency claim
- Leakage deduction of 0% is justified only as 'deemed negligible' in the verification report, while the PDD records a 5% quantified deduction — an unresolved contradiction that inflates net credits
- No buffer pool is recorded for the project, leaving no financial backstop against potential reversal or over-crediting
- Additionality VVB verification status is contradictory: the verification report (2023) records it as not verified, while the validation report (2025) records it as verified
- The monitoring report (2022) records a total ERR of 6,089 tCO2e, while the verification report records 40,763 tCO2e — a six-fold discrepancy that cannot be reconciled from the available documents
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 42 | 42 | 0 | |
| 2020 | 4,212 | 4,212 | 0 | |
| 2021 | 5,170 | 5,152 | 18 | |
| 2022 | 6,695 | 1,855 | 4,840 | |
| 2023 | 4,570 | 0 | 4,570 | |
| Total | 20,689 | 11,261 | 9,428 |
Risk Indicators
Combined test present but VVB verification status contradictory across documents
no reversal events; avoidance-type project lowers inherent risk
0% deduction with 'deemed negligible' justification; PDD records 5% quantified — unresolved
Project-specific baseline, reassessed 2024; not jurisdictional
Grievance mechanism and benefit sharing documented; FPIC status contradictory
CORSIA eligibility and CCP status both unstated; dual-channel risk unassessed
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →