Skip to main content
GSEnergy Efficiency - DomesticBangladeshGeneral Methodologyv2.1

VPA 94 - GHG Emission Reduction through use of Bondhu Chula (Improved Cook Stoves) in Bangladesh

GS-3800 ↗ · current registry ID: GS11841

#413of 1329 in Industrial#66of 121 in Bangladesh#660of 1801 in Gold Standard (GS)

5.2/ 10
Integrity
5.5
Transparency
6.0
Claim Safety
4.0
Documentation
5.0

Audit Analysis

A Gold Standard cookstove VPA in Bangladesh with a VVB-confirmed combined additionality test and a quantified 5% leakage deduction, but undermined by a 53× gap between the lifetime ex-ante estimate and the single-period verified ERR, a project-specific baseline with no documented reassessment, no buffer pool, and a long list of corrective actions spanning formatting, stakeholder consultation, and design-change documentation. The project is CCP-eligible but CORSIA status is unstated, and multiple cross-document contradictions (FPIC, safeguards, FNRB method, crediting period) reduce confidence in the data record.

Red Flags

  • Verified ERR of 523,571 tCO₂e for a single 12-month monitoring period is approximately 53× the pro-rata expectation of ~9,829 tCO₂e derived from the 49,146 tCO₂e lifetime ex-ante estimate over a 5-year crediting period — a discrepancy that cannot be explained by normal project growth and suggests either a scope/unit mismatch or a significant over-crediting risk.
  • FPIC is recorded as not conducted in the 2024 verification report, contradicting the 2023 validation report which states it was conducted; the more recent and authoritative verification report is privileged, leaving a safeguards gap.
  • No buffer pool percentage is stated in any available document, and no reversal events are documented, leaving permanence risk unquantified for a project whose stoves have a finite service life.
  • Eighteen or more corrective actions were raised by the VVB and GS, covering grievance-book implementation, stakeholder-consultation timing, PoA duration compliance, and missing design-change records — indicating systemic documentation and process weaknesses.
  • The PDD lists a 28-year crediting period (2014–2042) while the validation report and current VPA use a 5-year period (2021–2026); the 28-year figure was explicitly challenged in material findings (CAR 02) and resolved via transition rules, but the inconsistency persists across documents.

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2022
5,3555,3550
2023
8,43908,439
Total13,7945,3558,439

Risk Indicators

Additionality

Combined test, VVB-confirmed

Permanence

reversal risk unquantified

Leakage

5% quantified deduction with justification

Baseline

Project-specific; no reassessment date found

Safeguards

Grievance mechanism present; FPIC not conducted per VR

Double-claim

CCP-eligible; CORSIA status not stated

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-09-10General Methodology v2.1

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents