Skip to main content
VCSAgriculture Forestry and Other Land UseKenya Registry: RegisteredVM0017

Western Kenya Soil Carbon Project

VCS-3669 ↗

#170of 261 in Soil carbon#134of 157 in Kenya#1083of 1339 in Verra (VCS)#6of 8 in VM0017

4.3/ 10
Integrity
4.5
Transparency
4.0
Claim Safety
5.0
Documentation
3.5

Audit Analysis

The Western Kenya Soil Carbon Project is a VCS ALM soil-carbon project with a 27% buffer pool and no reported reversals, but it carries 12 material findings, a high overall risk rating of 27, and multiple cross-document contradictions that undermine confidence in its documentation and monitoring data. The project delivered only about 73% of its monitoring-period ERR expectation, and key SOC data were missing for the entire first monitoring period due to pandemic restrictions. While the VVB (TÜV NORD CERT) confirmed additionality and the project is registered, the volume of corrective actions and inconsistencies warrants caution before relying on its credits.

Red Flags

  • 12 material findings raised by the VVB, including insufficient additionality demonstration, inconsistent leakage justification, non-reproducible ERR calculations, and insufficient safeguards description
  • Overall risk rating of 27.00 (Internal 16, External 4, Natural 6.72) as reported in the verification report
  • SOC removals could not be estimated for the entire 2019–2022 monitoring period due to missing data (fertilizer use, crop yields, SOC parameters)
  • Seven contradictions across documents, including conflicting buffer pool percentages (27% vs 12%), conflicting leakage justifications (deemed negligible vs quantified), and conflicting verified ERR figures (79,391 vs 123,215)
  • Leakage deduction of 0% with a justification that the VVB itself flagged as inconsistent (Finding 4), requiring corrective action to demonstrate leakage is truly zero

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2019
5,60905,609
2020
22,434022,434
2021
22,4347322,361
2022
7,47807,478
Total57,9557357,882

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed barrier test but flagged as insufficiently dem

Permanence

27% buffer pool, no reversals, but risk assessment flagged a

Leakage

0% deduction with justification flagged as inconsistent by V

Baseline

Project-specific baseline; 10-year reassessment not yet due

Safeguards

FPIC and grievance mechanism present, but VVB flagged insuff

Double-claim

CORSIA eligibility and CCP status not stated in available do

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-08-30VM0017

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents