Woodstock Forest Carbon Offsets
#56of 345 in United States#28of 59 in City Forest Credits (CFC)
Audit Analysis
The Camp Lakota Woodland Preservation Project is a 40-year urban tree preservation credit under the City Forest Credits standard, with a VVB-confirmed barrier additionality test, a quantified 18.3% leakage deduction, and a 10% reversal pool. However, the project-specific baseline lacks a documented reassessment date, no FPIC or grievance mechanism is recorded, and two minor contradictions between the validation and verification reports introduce small reliability concerns. Overall, the project is moderately robust but has documentation gaps typical of a newer, less transparent registry.
Red Flags
- Project-specific baseline with no documented reassessment date; the CFC standard's reassessment cadence is not confirmed in the extracted record
- No FPIC or grievance mechanism documented despite the project being an urban forest in a community setting (Camp Lakota)
- Contradiction between validation report ('combined' additionality test) and verification report ('barrier' test) on the same date suggests inconsistent internal documentation
- FNRB method and value not stated in any available document, leaving the forest net removal baseline unverified
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 8,266 | 0 | 8,266 | |
| 2025 | 3,356 | 0 | 3,356 | |
| Total | 11,622 | 0 | 11,622 |
Risk Indicators
VVB-confirmed barrier test
mixed evidence / unresolved risk
18.3% quantified deduction
Project-specific, no reassessment date
Mentioned but FPIC/grievance absent
CORSIA/CCP status not stated
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →