Skip to main content
VCSEnergy industries (renewable/non-renewable sources)Turkey Registry: RegisteredACM0002

Yamanli II Hydroelectric Power Plant

VCS-1004 ↗

#1282of 1935 in Renewable energy#243of 295 in Turkey#894of 1339 in Verra (VCS)#997of 1287 in ACM0002

4.8/ 10
Integrity
5.0
Transparency
4.8
Claim Safety
4.0
Documentation
5.5

Audit Analysis

The Yamanli II Hydroelectric Power Plant is a VCS-registered renewable energy project with a verified additionality test and jurisdictional baseline, but it carries significant data-reliability concerns. The verified emission reductions (591,568 tCO₂) are roughly 8.4 times the pro-rata ex-ante expectation derived from the validation report, and the verification report lists 13 material findings including errors in the grid emission-factor calculation and a timing flaw in the investment analysis that undermines the additionality case. Multiple cross-document inconsistencies in leakage treatment, crediting-period dates, and calibration records further erode confidence in the reported figures.

Red Flags

  • Verified ERR of 591,568 tCO₂ is approximately 8.4× the pro-rata ex-ante expectation (≈70,360 tCO₂) derived from the validation report's 117,266 tCO₂ over the original 10-year crediting period, raising serious over-crediting concerns.
  • The investment analysis used input parameters from a revised Financial Sustainability Report (2012) that post-dated the investment decision, undermining the robustness of the investment test (CAR 10).
  • The grid emission factor calculation used an arithmetic average instead of the required weighted average (CAR 19), and the BM_EF calculation did not follow the Emission Factor Tool precisely (CAR 20), both of which affect the magnitude of claimed reductions.
  • Thirteen material findings and eight corrective actions were identified in the verification report, including a contradiction in calibration records and inconsistent geocoordinates across project documents.
  • Leakage justification is inconsistent: the verification report states 'deemed negligible' while the monitoring report indicates leakage was 'quantified'.

Credit Vintages

No issuances recorded on the registry.

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed but investment-test timing flawed

Permanence

Grid-connected HPP – no reversal risk

Leakage

0% deemed negligible; MR says quantified

Baseline

Jurisdictional EF but calculation errors flagged

Safeguards

FPIC, grievance mechanism, safeguards documented

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-08-31ACM0002

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents