Skip to main content
GSBiogas - ElectricityChinaACM0001

Zhangjiajie Meitanwan MSW landfill site LFG recovery to power project

GS-3551 ↗ · current registry ID: GS11538

#88of 268 in Biogas#595of 1084 in China#754of 1801 in Gold Standard (GS)#56of 159 in ACM0001

5.1/ 10
Integrity
5.5
Transparency
4.5
Claim Safety
5.0
Documentation
5.5

Audit Analysis

A Gold Standard landfill-gas-to-power project in China with VVB-confirmed additionality and a legally mandated capture obligation, but undermined by a significant grid emission factor discrepancy between the verification and monitoring reports, a project-specific modeled baseline, and the absence of key operational parameters such as FNRB values, usage rates, and an LCA. The claimed and verified ER figures match exactly at 107,303 tCO₂e for the 2023 monitoring period, but the underlying data inconsistencies and missing sustainability documentation limit confidence in the robustness of the credit.

Red Flags

  • Grid emission factor differs by 52% between the verification report (0.8587 tCO₂/MWh) and the monitoring report (0.57025 tCO₂/MWh), both dated 2023-11-28, creating material uncertainty in the ER calculation
  • Leakage justification is inconsistent: the verification report describes it as 'quantified' while the monitoring report labels it 'deemed negligible', despite a 0% deduction in both cases
  • Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC) was not conducted, despite the project operating on a municipal landfill site in a populated area
  • No FNRB value, usage rate, or LCA is reported in any available document, leaving the biogas-to-electricity conversion chain partially unverified

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2021
7,4391,3506,089
2022
65,67118765,484
2023
34,193034,193
Total107,3031,537105,766

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed common-practice test; capture legally required

Permanence

Biogas-to-power project; no carbon-stock reversal risk; 5-year crediting period

Leakage

0% deduction; justification inconsistent between verification and monitoring reports

Baseline

Project-specific modeled baseline; no reassessment date stated

Safeguards

Grievance mechanism and benefit sharing present; FPIC not conducted

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated in available documents

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-09-10ACM0001

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents