Skip to main content
VCSEnergy industries (renewable/non-renewable sources); Waste handling and disposalChina Registry: RegisteredACM0001

Ziyang LFG Power Generation Project

VCS-2525 ↗

#414of 1084 in China#496of 1339 in Verra (VCS)#38of 159 in ACM0001

5.4/ 10
Integrity
5.5
Transparency
5.0
Claim Safety
6.0
Documentation
5.0

Audit Analysis

The Ziyang LFG power generation project has a solid additionality foundation (combined test, VVB-confirmed, capture not legally required) and a reasonable 0% leakage deduction for grid-displacement credits. However, seven material findings—including a 54.94% under-delivery versus the validated PDD estimate, project boundary misrepresentation, and missing QA/QC documentation—along with contradictions in verified ERR figures and baseline characterization, significantly erode confidence in the project's data integrity and documentation quality.

Red Flags

  • Verified ERR of 35,998 tCO2e is only ~48% of the pro-rata expectation (~74,500 tCO2e) for the 11-month monitoring period, and the verification report itself flags a 54.94% shortfall versus the validated PDD without adequate assessment
  • Contradiction in verified ERR: 35,998 (verification report, Oct 2022) vs 124,659 (verification report, Feb 2022 / issuance, Mar 2022) — the basis for the discrepancy is not explained in the extracted record
  • Baseline characterization contradicts itself: described as 'measured' in the Oct 2022 verification report but 'modeled' in the Feb 2022 verification report
  • Project boundary was incorrectly depicted in Figures 3-1 and 5-1, omitting the flare system, and the project description initially excluded flaring of excess gas
  • FPIC was not conducted despite the project operating in a community-adjacent landfill setting in China

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2020
70,36870,3680
2021
79,41454,69124,723
2022
10,875010,875
Total160,657125,05935,598

Risk Indicators

Additionality

Combined test, VVB-confirmed, capture not legally required

Permanence

mixed evidence / unresolved risk

Leakage

0% deduction, deemed negligible — reasonable for grid displacement

Baseline

Project-specific, measured; contradiction on measured vs modeled

Safeguards

Grievance mechanism present, safeguards mentioned, but FPIC not conducted

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status both not stated — dual-channel risk unassessed

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-09-04ACM0001

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents