Skip to main content
CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
Tools
EN
Re-assessment pendingACRForest CarbonWEST VIRGINIA, USRegistry: RegisteredARB-US-FOREST

Blue Source - Powellton Improved Forest Management Project

Developer: Anew Carbon Development, LLC

ACR-267 ↗

#126of 539 in REDD+#310of 1791 in United States#193of 978 in American Carbon Registry (ACR)#41of 250 in ARB-US-FOREST

Re-assessment pending — this is the last published analysis (2026-09-13). It stays visible until the new analysis replaces it.

Assessment

CarbonMeld document-based assessment

01020304 Overall 5.9 / 10 Dimension scores are locked — the faint arcs are empty tracks, not zero scores.

Scale 0–10 · method weights: integrity 35% · transparency 25% · claim safety 25% · documentation 15%.

Re-assessment pending · 2026-09-13

Analysis

The Powellton Improved Forest Management Project is a 25-year ACR forest carbon project in West Virginia with a 19.2% buffer pool, no reported reversals, and a quantified 20% leakage deduction. However, the project-specific modeled baseline, absence of documented FPIC and grievance mechanisms, and a notable discrepancy in reported ERR figures (161,329 vs. 144,635 within the same verification report) introduce moderate risk. The project is reasonably documented with 18 source files and an independent VVB, but key safeguards and baseline reassessment details remain unconfirmed in the extracted record.

Red Flags

3 red flags detected — Unlock with Premium

Findings

Risk Indicators

Additionality

🔒

Permanence

🔒

Leakage

🔒

Baseline

🔒

Safeguards

🔒

Double-claim

🔒

Risk indicator details are a Premium feature

Score Breakdown

Score factors per dimension are a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Detailed Analysis

The detailed per-dimension analysis is a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Evidence

Unlock the full analysis

Per-dimension scores, risk indicators, 3 red flags, score factors, detailed analysis, and 19 registry documents (18 analyzed).

€9+ VAT · 30-day pass · one-time, no auto-renewal

Every rated project, PDF reports, API access, portfolio alerts and per-dimension scores with red-flag details in side-by-side comparisons for 30 days (public-data comparison is free; fair use: 30 projects per day).

Price + VAT · By paying you accept the Terms of Use — digital content, no refunds. How Premium works

Eligibility & market

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

  • Airlines (CORSIA)

    No CORSIA label on the registry

    Not usable for airlines' CORSIA obligations.

    Source: registry label

  • Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)

    No ICVCM information

    No CCP label and no ICVCM decision found for this project's methodology.

  • Removal or reduction

    Emission reduction or avoidance

    Prevents or reduces emissions — fits contribution claims, not SBTi neutralisation.

    Source: project sector

  • Paris Agreement (Article 6)

    No Article 6 authorization

    No corresponding adjustment: the host country can also count this reduction towards its own target.

    Source: registry label

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Registry labels last checked:2026-10-04

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2017
1,549,20700
2018
103,79500
2019
130,38600
2020
106,73300
2021
134,73200
2022
161,3290161,329
2023
144,6350144,635
Total2,330,8170305,964

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

Profile & governance

Analysis ProvenanceU.S. Forest Projects

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected] →

Contest this rating

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Contest this rating →