Skip to main content
CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
Tools
EN
Re-assessment pendingACRCoal Mine MethaneWEST VIRGINIA, USRegistry: Moved to another programARB-MMC

Bonny Abandoned Mine Methane Recovery Project

Developer: Keyrock Environment LLC

ACR-806 ↗

#512of 680 in Methane#1226of 1795 in United States#645of 978 in American Carbon Registry (ACR)#70of 119 in ARB-MMC

Score from methodology v2.1 (analysis of 12 Sep 2026). Re-assessment under v2.2 pending.

Moved to another program

The project has moved to another GHG program; any new credits are issued there, not on this registry.

American Carbon Registry: “TRANSFERRED”

Assessment

CarbonMeld document-based assessment

01020304 Overall 4.1 / 10 Dimension scores are locked — the faint arcs are empty tracks, not zero scores.

Scale 0–10 · method weights: integrity 35% · transparency 25% · claim safety 25% · documentation 15%.

Re-assessment pending · v2.1

Analysis

The Bonny Abandoned Mine Methane Recovery Project is a coal mine methane capture project under ACR with a named VVB (Dillon Consulting Limited) and no material findings or corrective actions. However, critical integrity elements — additionality test type, baseline methodology, and leakage treatment — are absent from the available documents, and a notable discrepancy exists between claimed (74,391) and verified (57,293) emission reduction figures. Low extraction confidence across documents further limits the reliability of the available evidence.

Red Flags

5 red flags detected — Unlock with Premium

Findings

Risk Indicators

Additionality

🔒

Permanence

🔒

Leakage

🔒

Baseline

🔒

Safeguards

🔒

Double-claim

🔒

Risk indicator details are a Premium feature

Score Breakdown

Score factors per dimension are a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Detailed Analysis

The detailed per-dimension analysis is a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Evidence

Unlock the full analysis

Per-dimension scores, risk indicators, 5 red flags, score factors, detailed analysis, and 7 registry documents (7 analyzed).

€9+ VAT · 30-day pass · one-time, no auto-renewal

Every rated project, PDF reports, API access, portfolio alerts and per-dimension scores with red-flag details in side-by-side comparisons for 30 days (public-data comparison is free; fair use: 30 projects per day).

Price + VAT · By paying you accept the Terms of Use — digital content, no refunds. How Premium works

Eligibility & market

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

  • Airlines (CORSIA)

    No CORSIA label on the registry

    Not usable for airlines' CORSIA obligations.

    Source: registry label

  • Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)

    Methodology under ICVCM assessmentACR Capturing and Destroying Methane from Coal

    The Integrity Council has not decided on this methodology yet.

    Source: ICVCM assessment

  • Removal or reduction

    Emission reduction or avoidance

    Prevents or reduces emissions — fits contribution claims, not SBTi neutralisation.

    Source: project sector

  • Paris Agreement (Article 6)

    No Article 6 authorization

    No corresponding adjustment: the host country can also count this reduction towards its own target.

    Source: registry label

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Registry labels last checked:2026-10-04

Credit Vintages Exhausted

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2022
49,80300
2023
57,29300
2024
74,42400
Total181,52000

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

Profile & governance

Analysis ProvenanceCAMM5806

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected] →

Contest this rating

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Contest this rating →