Skip to main content
CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
Tools
EN
Re-assessment pendingCARLandfill Gas Capture/CombustionUSRegistry: RegisteredCAR-US-LANDFILL

Berkeley County Landfill Gas Project

Developer: Anew Environmental, LLC

CAR-574 ↗

#226of 694 in Methane#615of 1794 in United States#381of 1013 in Climate Action Reserve (CAR)#62of 124 in CAR-US-LANDFILL

Score from methodology v2.1 (analysis of 17 Sep 2026). Re-assessment under v2.2 pending.

Assessment

CarbonMeld document-based assessment

01020304 Overall 5.2 / 10 Dimension scores are locked — the faint arcs are empty tracks, not zero scores.

Scale 0–10 · method weights: integrity 35% · transparency 25% · claim safety 25% · documentation 15%.

Re-assessment pending · v2.1

Analysis

The Berkeley County Landfill Gas Project is a CAR-registered methane capture project with a solid additionality case (combined test, VVB-verified, capture not legally required) and on-target emissions reduction delivery (verified 7,715 tCO₂e vs. claimed 7,682 tCO₂e for the 2023 monitoring period). However, the project lacks a documented leakage treatment, has no safeguards or grievance mechanism on record, and several key MRV parameters (FNRB method, usage monitoring) are not stated in the available documents, limiting confidence in the full MRV chain.

Red Flags

3 red flags detected — Unlock with Premium

Findings

Risk Indicators

Additionality

🔒

Permanence

🔒

Leakage

🔒

Baseline

🔒

Safeguards

🔒

Double-claim

🔒

Risk indicator details are a Premium feature

Score Breakdown

Score factors per dimension are a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Detailed Analysis

The detailed per-dimension analysis is a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Evidence

Unlock the full analysis

On this page: the analysis of 17 Sep 2026, marked “Re-assessment pending”. Per-dimension scores, risk indicators, 3 red flags, score factors, detailed analysis, and 75 registry documents (75 analyzed).

€9+ VAT · 30-day pass · one-time, no auto-renewal

Every rated project, PDF reports, API access, portfolio alerts and per-dimension scores with red-flag details in side-by-side comparisons for 30 days (public-data comparison is free; fair use: 30 projects per day).

Price + VAT · By paying you accept the Terms of Use — digital content, no refunds. How Premium works

Eligibility & market

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

  • Airlines (CORSIA)

    No CORSIA label on the registry

    Not usable for airlines' CORSIA obligations.

    Source: registry label

  • Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)

    CCP-labelled credits

    The registry marks these credits with the Core Carbon Principles label of the Integrity Council.

    Source: registry label

  • Removal or reduction

    Emission reduction or avoidance

    Prevents or reduces emissions — fits contribution claims, not SBTi neutralisation.

    Source: registry label

  • Paris Agreement (Article 6)

    No Article 6 authorization

    No corresponding adjustment: the host country can also count this reduction towards its own target.

    Source: registry label

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Registry labels last checked:2026-10-11

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2010
24,04124,0410
2011
24,05324,0530
2012
21,75921,7590
2013
18,18918,1890
2014
13,02813,0280
2015
12,99712,9970
2016
10,74410,7440
2017
12,09612,0960
2020
17,620017,620
2021
15,193015,193
2022
6,91906,919
2023
7,68207,682
Total184,321136,90747,414

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

Profile & governance

Analysis ProvenanceClimate Action Reserve U.S. Landfill Protocol, Version 6.0

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected] →

Contest this rating

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Contest this rating →