CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
Tools
ProjectsDevelopersComparePortfolioCCP trackerA–Z index BuyersCORSIA supplyCheck an offerAPI & MCP Method About the System Editorial Policy Score Your Project
EN
Workbench ProjectsDevelopersComparePortfolioCCP trackerA–Z index
← All projects
Re-assessment pendingCDMLandfill gasArgentinaRegistry: RegisteredAM0011

Landfill gas recovery at the Norte III Landfill, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Developer: Aria.Biz SA

CDM-0260 ↗

Worked comparison example (English)

#603of 691 in Methane#53of 60 in Argentina#5176of 5732 in CDM (UNFCCC)#6of 6 in AM0011

Score from methodology v2.1 (analysis of 22 Sep 2026). Re-assessment under v2.2 pending.

Assessment

CarbonMeld document-based assessment

01020304 Overall 3.6 / 10
Integrity 🔒 Transparency 🔒 Claim Safety 🔒 Documentation 🔒
Dimension scores are locked — the faint arcs are empty tracks, not zero scores.

Scale 0–10 · method weights: integrity 35% · transparency 25% · claim safety 25% · documentation 15%.

Re-assessment pending · v2.1

Scored2026-09-22medium confidenceLatest monitoring period ends: 2012-07-31

evidence: 21/21 registry documents analyzed · 5 red flags

Generated by CarbonMeld Analysis Pipeline · Methodology · Editorial Policy · About the System
Download Report (PDF)

Analysis

This CDM landfill gas project at Norte III, Buenos Aires, has a verified additionality assessment but is undermined by an extensive list of 27 material findings, a gas engine that has been out of service since October 2011, and verified emission reductions that represent only about 25% of the pro-rata expectation for the monitoring period. The project-specific modeled baseline, a 0% leakage deduction justified only as 'deemed negligible,' and multiple equipment and data-quality failures raise serious concerns about the robustness of the credit claims.

Red Flags

5 red flags detected — Unlock with Premium

Findings

Risk Indicators

Additionality

🔒

Permanence

🔒

Leakage

🔒

Baseline

🔒

Safeguards

🔒

Double-claim

🔒

Risk indicator details are a Premium feature

Score Breakdown

Score factors per dimension are a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Detailed Analysis

The detailed per-dimension analysis is a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Evidence

Unlock the full analysis

On this page: the analysis of 22 Sep 2026, marked “Re-assessment pending”. Per-dimension scores, risk indicators, 5 red flags, score factors, detailed analysis, and 21 registry documents (21 analyzed).

€9+ VAT · 30-day pass · one-time, no auto-renewal

Every rated project, PDF reports, API access, portfolio alerts and per-dimension scores with red-flag details in side-by-side comparisons for 30 days (public-data comparison is free; fair use: 30 projects per day).

Price + VAT · By paying you accept the Terms of Use — digital content, no refunds. How Premium works

Eligibility & market

Transactions in the CDM registry are discontinued as of 31 December 2026 (UNFCCC, checked 6 October 2026). This page keeps the project's record and our analysis.

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

  • Airlines (CORSIA)

    Not published

    This registry does not publish CORSIA eligibility per project.

  • Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)

    No ICVCM information

    No CCP label and no ICVCM decision found for this project's methodology.

  • Removal or reduction

    Emission reduction or avoidance

    Prevents or reduces emissions — fits contribution claims, not SBTi neutralisation.

    Source: project sector

  • Paris Agreement (Article 6)

    Not published

    This registry does not publish Article 6 authorizations.

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2007
58,247058,247
2008
85,476085,476
2010
61,673061,673
2011
262,2120262,212
2012
134,0060134,006
2013
84,352084,352
Total685,9660685,966

Methodology versions used

The methodology version stated in each monitoring, verification and issuance document, by period, compared with the official methodology pages.

  1. 2006–2007AM0011 v2.0since replaced by v3.0

    monitoring report

    official page · verified on

  2. 2007AM0011 v2.0since replaced by v3.0

    monitoring report

    official page · verified on

  3. 2007–2008AM0011 v2.0since replaced by v3.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  4. 2008–2010AM0011 v2.0since replaced by v3.0

    monitoring report

    official page · verified on

  5. 2010–2011AM0011 v2.0since replaced by v3.0

    monitoring report

    official page · verified on

  6. 2011AM0011 v2.0since replaced by v3.0

    monitoring report

    official page · verified on

  7. 2011–2012AM0011 v2.0since replaced by v3.0

    monitoring report

    official page · verified on

  • AM0011: Withdrawn (CDM / UNFCCC) · replaced byACM0001 · official page · verified on

A version is shown only when the document's own text writes it next to the methodology code. Current versions, status and CCP ranges come from the official pages linked, checked on the date shown.

Documents on the registry

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating

Profile & governance

Analysis ProvenanceAM0011
Methodology·Editorial Policy·About the System

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected] →

Contest this rating

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Contest this rating →