Skip to main content
CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
Tools
EN
ScoredCCLand use (AFOLU)ColombiaRegistry: RegisteredAR-ACM0003

Reforestación Comercial en Meta

ECO-7 ↗

#26of 170 in ARR (afforestation)#83of 213 in Colombia#78of 164 in CerCarbono (CC)#27of 111 in AR-ACM0003

Assessment

CarbonMeld document-based assessment

01020304 Overall 6.1 / 10 Dimension scores are locked — the faint arcs are empty tracks, not zero scores.

Scale 0–10 · method weights: integrity 35% · transparency 25% · claim safety 25% · documentation 15%.

Analysis

Reforestación Comercial en Meta (Colombia) plants or regenerates trees (afforestation, reforestation, revegetation) (Commercial Reforestation in Meta (Acacia mangium, Eucalyptus pellita, Pinus caribaea)) under AR-ACM0003; registry status Registered (ECO), 73,030 credits issued (vintages 2009–2021). The documents name Ruby Canyon Environmental, Inc as validation / verification body. Project area: 2,234 ha. The documents estimate 26,635 tCO2e per year, 401,708 tCO2e over 15 years. The latest monitoring report (2018 – 2021) reports 68,464 tCO2e achieved.

Red Flags

No red flags detected.

Findings

Risk Indicators

Additionality

🔒

Permanence

🔒

Leakage

🔒

Baseline

🔒

Safeguards

🔒

Double-claim

🔒

Risk indicator details are a Premium feature

Score Breakdown

Score factors per dimension are a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Detailed Analysis

The detailed per-dimension analysis is a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Evidence

Unlock the full analysis

Per-dimension scores, risk indicators, score factors, detailed analysis, and 20 registry documents (20 read).

€9+ VAT · 30-day pass · one-time, no auto-renewal

Every rated project, PDF reports, API access, portfolio alerts and per-dimension scores with red-flag details in side-by-side comparisons for 30 days (public-data comparison is free; fair use: 30 projects per day).

Price + VAT · By paying you accept the Terms of Use — digital content, no refunds. How Premium works

Eligibility & market

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

  • Airlines (CORSIA)

    Not published

    This registry does not publish CORSIA eligibility per project.

  • Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)

    No ICVCM information

    No CCP label and no ICVCM decision found for this project's methodology.

  • Removal or reduction

    Carbon removal

    Takes CO₂ out of the atmosphere — the only type that can neutralise residual emissions in an SBTi net-zero claim.

    Source: methodology

  • Paris Agreement (Article 6)

    Not published

    This registry does not publish Article 6 authorizations.

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2009
6946940
2010
60,256060,256
2018
1,47801,478
2019
5,08405,084
2020
5,09805,098
2021
4200420
Total73,03069472,336

Methodology versions used

The methodology version stated in each monitoring, verification and issuance document, by period, compared with the official methodology pages.

  1. 2018–2021AR-ACM0003 v2.0current version

    monitoring report + verification report + issuance document

    official page · verified on

  • AR-ACM0003: Active (CDM / UNFCCC) · official page · verified on

A version is shown only when the document's own text writes it next to the methodology code. Current versions, status and CCP ranges come from the official pages linked, checked on the date shown.

Documents on the registry

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

Profile & governance

Analysis ProvenanceAR-ACM0003

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected] →

Contest this rating

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Contest this rating →