CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
Tools
ProjectsDevelopersComparePortfolioCCP trackerA–Z index BuyersCORSIA supplyCheck an offerAPI & MCP Method About the System Editorial Policy Score Your Project
EN
Workbench ProjectsDevelopersComparePortfolioCCP trackerA–Z index
← All projects
ScoredGSSmall, Low - Impact HydroChinaRegistry: RegisteredACM0002

Hunan Guanbaodu-Liangjiangkou Small-scale Hydropower Bundle Project

Developer: Climate Bridge (Shanghai) Ltd

GS-1216 ↗ · current registry ID: GS835

Worked comparison example (English)

#4of 4970 in Renewable energy#1of 3020 in China#4of 2181 in Gold Standard (GS)#4of 3425 in ACM0002

Assessment

CarbonMeld document-based assessment

01020304 Overall 7.5 / 10
Integrity 🔒 Transparency 🔒 Claim Safety 🔒 Documentation 🔒
Dimension scores are locked — the faint arcs are empty tracks, not zero scores.

Scale 0–10 · method weights: integrity 35% · transparency 25% · claim safety 25% · documentation 15%.

Scored2026-10-05medium confidence

evidence:32/34registry documents analyzed · 0red flags

Generated by CarbonMeld Analysis Pipeline · Methodology · Editorial Policy · About the System
Download Report (PDF)

Analysis

Hunan Guanbaodu-Liangjiangkou Small-scale Hydropower Bundle Project (China) generates grid-connected renewable electricity (hydropower, Guanbaodu 4MW and Liangjiangkou 1.89MW) under ACM0002 version 16.0; registry status Registered (GS), 224,413 credits issued (vintages 2009–2023). The documents name TÜV Rheinland (China) Ltd as validation / verification body. The latest monitoring report (01/01/2023 – 31/12/2023) reports 4,747 tCO2e achieved.

Red Flags

No red flags detected.

Findings

Risk Indicators

Additionality

🔒

Permanence

🔒

Leakage

🔒

Baseline

🔒

Safeguards

🔒

Double-claim

🔒

Risk indicator details are a Premium feature

Score Breakdown

Score factors per dimension are a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Detailed Analysis

The detailed per-dimension analysis is a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Evidence

Unlock the full analysis

Per-dimension scores, risk indicators, score factors, detailed analysis, and 34 registry documents (32 analyzed).

€9+ VAT · 30-day pass · one-time, no auto-renewal

Every rated project, PDF reports, API access, portfolio alerts and per-dimension scores with red-flag details in side-by-side comparisons for 30 days (public-data comparison is free; fair use: 30 projects per day).

Price + VAT · By paying you accept the Terms of Use — digital content, no refunds. How Premium works

Eligibility & market

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

  • Airlines (CORSIA)

    No CORSIA label on the registry

    Not usable for airlines' CORSIA obligations.

    Source: registry label

  • Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)

    Methodology not approved by ICVCMACM0002

    The Integrity Council assessed this methodology as not meeting the Core Carbon Principles.

    Source: ICVCM assessment

  • Removal or reduction

    Emission reduction or avoidance

    Prevents or reduces emissions — fits contribution claims, not SBTi neutralisation.

    Source: registry label

  • Paris Agreement (Article 6)

    Not published

    This registry does not publish Article 6 authorizations.

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Registry labels last checked:2026-09-27

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2009
16,47116,4710
2010
15,63115,6310
2011
15,08215,0820
2012
21,52721,5270
2013
21,05021,0500
2014
17,02017,0200
2015
20,42420,4240
2016
12,81612,8160
2017
12,84312,8430
2018
10,28210,2820
2019
14,21614,2160
2020
16,63616,6360
2021
12,20211,958244
2022
13,46613,4660
2023
4,74704,747
Total224,413219,4224,991

Methodology versions used

The methodology version stated in each monitoring, verification and issuance document, by period, compared with the official methodology pages.

  1. 2009–2010ACM0002 v12.1since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report

    official page · verified on

  2. 2011–2012ACM0002 v12.1since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report

    official page · verified on

  3. 2012–2013ACM0002 v12.1since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  4. 2013–2014ACM0002 v12.1since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  5. 2014–2015ACM0002 v12.1since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  6. 2016–2017ACM0002 v16.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  7. 2018ACM0002 v16.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  8. 2019ACM0002 v16.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  9. 2020ACM0002 v16.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  10. 2021ACM0002 v16.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  11. 2022ACM0002 v16.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  12. 2023ACM0002 v21.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  • ACM0002: Active (CDM / UNFCCC) · official page · verified on

A version is shown only when the document's own text writes it next to the methodology code. Current versions, status and CCP ranges come from the official pages linked, checked on the date shown.

Documents on the registry

Retired by

Organisations named as beneficiaries in the registry's public retirement records.

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating

Profile & governance

Analysis ProvenanceACM0002
Methodology·Editorial Policy·About the System

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected] →

Contest this rating

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Contest this rating →