Skip to main content
CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
Tools
EN
ScoredGSOtherChinaRegistry: RegisteredACM0001

*Suzhou Qizi Mountain Landfill Gas Recovery Project (300259)

Developer: South Pole Ltd

GS-1643 ↗ · current registry ID: GS397

#3of 693 in Methane#1of 3063 in China#2of 2182 in Gold Standard (GS)#1of 282 in ACM0001

Assessment

CarbonMeld document-based assessment

01020304 Overall 8.0 / 10 Dimension scores are locked — the faint arcs are empty tracks, not zero scores.

Scale 0–10 · method weights: integrity 35% · transparency 25% · claim safety 25% · documentation 15%.

Analysis

*Suzhou Qizi Mountain Landfill Gas Recovery Project (300259) (China) captures landfill gas and flares or uses it (landfill gas recovery and utilization for electricity generation with a flare for emergency purposes) under ACM0001 version 19.0; registry status Registered (GS), 1,588,298 credits issued (vintages 2007–2022). The documents name China Certification Center, Inc as validation / verification body. The latest monitoring report (22/04/2021 – 30/04/2022) reports 118,814 tCO2e achieved.

Red Flags

No red flags detected.

Findings

Risk Indicators

Additionality

🔒

Permanence

🔒

Leakage

🔒

Baseline

🔒

Safeguards

🔒

Double-claim

🔒

Risk indicator details are a Premium feature

Score Breakdown

Score factors per dimension are a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Detailed Analysis

The detailed per-dimension analysis is a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Evidence

Unlock the full analysis

Per-dimension scores, risk indicators, score factors, detailed analysis, and 24 registry documents (24 analyzed).

€9+ VAT · 30-day pass · one-time, no auto-renewal

Every rated project, PDF reports, API access, portfolio alerts and per-dimension scores with red-flag details in side-by-side comparisons for 30 days (public-data comparison is free; fair use: 30 projects per day).

Price + VAT · By paying you accept the Terms of Use — digital content, no refunds. How Premium works

Eligibility & market

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

  • Airlines (CORSIA)

    No CORSIA label on the registry

    Not usable for airlines' CORSIA obligations.

    Source: registry label

  • Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)

    CCP-labelled credits

    The registry marks these credits with the Core Carbon Principles label of the Integrity Council.

    Source: registry label

  • Removal or reduction

    Emission reduction or avoidance

    Prevents or reduces emissions — fits contribution claims, not SBTi neutralisation.

    Source: registry label

  • Paris Agreement (Article 6)

    Not published

    This registry does not publish Article 6 authorizations.

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Registry labels last checked:2026-09-27

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2007
63,96362,9291,034
2008
85,34173,61411,727
2009
97,70797,7061
2010
123,454120,8802,574
2011
106,63796,9919,646
2012
84,47784,4770
2013
96,03996,0390
2014
129,224122,3376,887
2015
104,000104,0000
2016
120,694110,69410,000
2017
112,075107,0755,000
2018
144,201144,2010
2019
135,32893,07842,250
2020
133,714117,94715,767
2021
46,18646,1860
2022
5,2585,2580
Total1,588,2981,483,412104,886

Methodology versions used

The methodology version stated in each monitoring, verification and issuance document, by period, compared with the official methodology pages.

  1. 2007–2009ACM0001 v8.0since replaced by v19.0

    monitoring report

    official page · verified on

    outside the ICVCM CCP-approved range (GS: 15.0-19.0) · official page · verified on

  2. 2009–2010ACM0001 v8.0since replaced by v19.0

    monitoring report

    official page · verified on

    outside the ICVCM CCP-approved range (GS: 15.0-19.0) · official page · verified on

  3. 2010–2011ACM0001 v8.0since replaced by v19.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

    outside the ICVCM CCP-approved range (GS: 15.0-19.0) · official page · verified on

  4. 2012–2013ACM0001 v8.0since replaced by v19.0

    monitoring report

    official page · verified on

    outside the ICVCM CCP-approved range (GS: 15.0-19.0) · official page · verified on

  5. 2018–2020ACM0001 v16.0since replaced by v19.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

    in the ICVCM CCP-approved range (GS: 15.0-19.0) · official page · verified on

  6. 2020–2021ACM0001 v16.0since replaced by v19.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

    in the ICVCM CCP-approved range (GS: 15.0-19.0) · official page · verified on

  7. 2020–2022ACM0001the documents for this period state different versions (v16.0, v19.0)

    monitoring report

  8. 2021–2022ACM0001 v19.0current version

    monitoring report

    official page · verified on

    in the ICVCM CCP-approved range (GS: 15.0-19.0) · official page · verified on

  • ACM0001: Active (CDM / UNFCCC) · official page · verified on

Being within an ICVCM-approved version range is information only: it does not mean these credits carry the CCP label, which the registry assigns to each issuance.

A version is shown only when the document's own text writes it next to the methodology code. Current versions, status and CCP ranges come from the official pages linked, checked on the date shown.

Documents on the registry

Retired by

Organisations named as beneficiaries in the registry's public retirement records.

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

Profile & governance

Analysis ProvenanceACM0001

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected] →

Contest this rating

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Contest this rating →