Skip to main content
CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
ScoredGSEnergy Efficiency - DomesticRwandaRegistry: RegisteredGS-TPDDTEC

GS2449 GS1265 African Biomass Energy Conservation PoA Rwanda Biomass Conservation (4)

Developer: Hestian Innovation

GS-361 ↗ · current registry ID: GS2449

#327of 1735 in Industrial#22of 148 in Rwanda#584of 2172 in Gold Standard (GS)#85of 313 in GS-TPDDTEC

Assessment

CarbonMeld document-based assessment

01020304 Overall 6.6 / 10 Dimension scores are locked — the faint arcs are empty tracks, not zero scores.

Scale 0–10 · method weights: integrity 35% · transparency 25% · claim safety 25% · documentation 15%.

Analysis

GS2449 GS1265 African Biomass Energy Conservation PoA Rwanda Biomass Conservation (4) (Rwanda) distributes improved cookstoves or other technologies that reduce household thermal energy use (ceramic stove) under GS 110411_TPDDTEC / Technologies and Practices to Displace Decentralised Thermal Energy Consumption (11/04/2011); registry status Registered (GS), 8,564 credits issued (vintages 2013–2014). The latest monitoring report (2013-09-20 – 2014-09-19) reports 8,564 tCO2e achieved.

Red Flags

No red flags detected.

Findings

Risk Indicators

Additionality

🔒

Permanence

🔒

Leakage

🔒

Baseline

🔒

Safeguards

🔒

Double-claim

🔒

Risk indicator details are a Premium feature

Score Breakdown

Score factors per dimension are a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Detailed Analysis

The detailed per-dimension analysis is a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Evidence

Unlock the full analysis

Per-dimension scores, risk indicators, score factors, detailed analysis, and 13 registry documents (13 read).

€9+ VAT per month · card subscription, renews automatically until you cancel

Every rated project, PDF reports, API access, portfolio alerts and per-dimension scores with red-flag details in side-by-side comparisons (public-data comparison is free; fair use: 30 projects per day). Cancel any time from your account page. Crypto: $9 for one month, no automatic renewal.

Price + VAT · By subscribing or paying you accept the Terms of Use — the card subscription renews every month until you cancel; digital content, no refunds. How Premium works

Eligibility & market

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

  • Airlines (CORSIA)

    No CORSIA label on the registry

    Not usable for airlines' CORSIA obligations.

    Source: registry label · read on 27 Sep 2026

    Covers: this project's credit records as read on the registry

  • Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)

    Methodology approved by ICVCMGS TPDDTEC

    The methodology meets the Core Carbon Principles; this project's credits do not carry the CCP label yet.

    Source: ICVCM assessment · ICVCM table read on 4 Oct 2026

    Covers: the methodology (every project using it), not this project's credits

  • Removal or reduction

    Emission reduction or avoidance

    Prevents or reduces emissions — fits contribution claims, not SBTi neutralisation.

    Source: registry label · read on 27 Sep 2026

    Covers: the project type, not a label on individual credits

  • Paris Agreement (Article 6)

    Not published

    This registry does not publish Article 6 authorizations.

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Registry labels last checked:2026-09-27

Credit VintagesExhausted

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2013
1,2351,2350
2014
7,3297,3290
Total8,5648,5640

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

Profile & governance

Analysis ProvenanceGS 110411_TPDDTEC / Technologies and Practices to Displace Decentralised Thermal Energy Consumption (11/04/2011)

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected] →

Contest this rating

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Contest this rating →