Skip to main content
CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
Tools
EN
ScoredGSEnergy Efficiency - DomesticBangladeshRegistry: RegisteredGS-SIMPLIFIED-COOKSTOVES

VPA 24 - GHG Emission Reduction through use of Bondhu Chula (Improved Cook Stoves) in Bangladesh

Developer: Bangladesh Bondhu Foundation

GS-763 ↗ · current registry ID: GS4389

#19of 1725 in Industrial#3of 135 in Bangladesh#48of 2182 in Gold Standard (GS)#3of 202 in GS-SIMPLIFIED-COOKSTOVES

Assessment

CarbonMeld document-based assessment

01020304 Overall 7.1 / 10 Dimension scores are locked — the faint arcs are empty tracks, not zero scores.

Scale 0–10 · method weights: integrity 35% · transparency 25% · claim safety 25% · documentation 15%.

Analysis

VPA 24 - GHG Emission Reduction through use of Bondhu Chula (Improved Cook Stoves) in Bangladesh (Bangladesh) distributes efficient cookstoves (Gold Standard simplified methodology) (Bondhu Chula (Improved Cook Stoves)) under TPDDTEC V4.0; registry status Registered (GS), 31,350 credits issued (vintages 2015–2020). The documents name TÜV NORD CERT GmbH as validation / verification body. The documents report 183,882 stoves (2023-10-31). The latest monitoring report (01/03/2021 – 28/02/2022) reports 11,575 tCO2e achieved.

Red Flags

No red flags detected.

Findings

Risk Indicators

Additionality

🔒

Permanence

🔒

Leakage

🔒

Baseline

🔒

Safeguards

🔒

Double-claim

🔒

Risk indicator details are a Premium feature

Score Breakdown

Score factors per dimension are a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Detailed Analysis

The detailed per-dimension analysis is a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Evidence

Unlock the full analysis

Per-dimension scores, risk indicators, score factors, detailed analysis, and 22 registry documents (20 analyzed).

€9+ VAT · 30-day pass · one-time, no auto-renewal

Every rated project, PDF reports, API access, portfolio alerts and per-dimension scores with red-flag details in side-by-side comparisons for 30 days (public-data comparison is free; fair use: 30 projects per day).

Price + VAT · By paying you accept the Terms of Use — digital content, no refunds. How Premium works

Eligibility & market

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

  • Airlines (CORSIA)

    Stated in the project documents

    The documents claim CORSIA eligibility, but no registry label confirms it: check vintage and authorization.

    Source: project documents (not confirmed by the registry)

  • Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)

    Methodology rejected for some versionsGS The Gold Standard Simplified Methodology

    The Integrity Council rejected some versions of this protocol; other versions are still under assessment: check which version the project uses.

    Source: ICVCM assessment

  • Removal or reduction

    Emission reduction or avoidance

    Prevents or reduces emissions — fits contribution claims, not SBTi neutralisation.

    Source: registry label

  • Paris Agreement (Article 6)

    Not published

    This registry does not publish Article 6 authorizations.

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Registry labels last checked:2026-09-27

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2015
8,8158,8150
2016
7,9007,9000
2017
4,7874,7870
2018
4,6308483,782
2019
4,48404,484
2020
7340734
Total31,35022,3509,000

Retired by

Organisations named as beneficiaries in the registry's public retirement records.

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

Profile & governance

Analysis ProvenanceThe Gold Standard Simplified Methodology for Efficient Cookstoves

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected] →

Contest this rating

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Contest this rating →