CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
Tools
ProjectsDevelopersComparePortfolioCCP trackerA–Z index BuyersCORSIA supplyCheck an offerAPI & MCP Method About the System Editorial Policy Score Your Project
EN
Workbench ProjectsDevelopersComparePortfolioCCP trackerA–Z index
← All projects
ScoredVCSAgriculture Forestry and Other Land UsePeruRegistry: Issuance requestedVM0007

Reduction of deforestation and degradation in Tambopata National Reserve and Bahuaja-Sonene National Park within the area of Madre de Dios region –Peru

Developer: Asociación para la Investigación y Desarrollo Integral – AIDER

VCS-1067 ↗

Worked comparison example (English)

#46of 303 in Soil carbon#11of 79 in Peru#345of 1612 in Verra (VCS)#10of 26 in VM0007

Assessment

CarbonMeld document-based assessment

01020304 Overall 6.3 / 10
Integrity 🔒 Transparency 🔒 Claim Safety 🔒 Documentation 🔒
Dimension scores are locked — the faint arcs are empty tracks, not zero scores.

Scale 0–10 · method weights: integrity 35% · transparency 25% · claim safety 25% · documentation 15%.

Scored2026-10-12medium confidence

evidence: 57/67 registry documents read · 0 red flags

Generated by CarbonMeld Analysis Pipeline · Methodology · Editorial Policy · About the System
Download Report (PDF)

Analysis

Reduction of deforestation and degradation in Tambopata National Reserve and Bahuaja-Sonene National Park within the area of Madre de Dios region –Peru (Peru) avoids deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+) under VM0007 REDD+ Methodology Framework (REDD-MF) version 1.4; registry status Issuance requested (VCS), 4,874,608 credits issued (vintages 2010–2020). The documents name Rainforest Alliance as validation body and Rainforest Alliance, AENOR (2011-07-01 – 2013-06-30, 2013-07-01 – 2014-06-30, 2014-07-01 – 2015-06-30, 2015-07-01 – 2017-06-30), Colombian Institute for Technical Standards and Certification – ICONTEC (2017-07-01 – 2018-12-31), SCS Global Services (SCS) (2019-01-01 – 2019-12-31) as verification bodies. The latest monitoring report (01 – January – 2021 – 31 – December - 2023) reports 1,395,978 tCO2e achieved.

Red Flags

No red flags detected.

Findings

Risk Indicators

Additionality

🔒

Permanence

🔒

Leakage

🔒

Baseline

🔒

Safeguards

🔒

Double-claim

🔒

Risk indicator details are a Premium feature

Score Breakdown

Score factors per dimension are a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Detailed Analysis

The detailed per-dimension analysis is a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Evidence

Unlock the full analysis

Per-dimension scores, risk indicators, score factors, detailed analysis, and 67 registry documents (57 read).

€9+ VAT · 30-day pass · one-time, no auto-renewal

Every rated project, PDF reports, API access, portfolio alerts and per-dimension scores with red-flag details in side-by-side comparisons for 30 days (public-data comparison is free; fair use: 30 projects per day).

Price + VAT · By paying you accept the Terms of Use — digital content, no refunds. How Premium works

Eligibility & market

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

  • Airlines (CORSIA)

    No CORSIA label on the registry

    Not usable for airlines' CORSIA obligations.

    Source: registry label

  • Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)

    No ICVCM information

    No CCP label and no ICVCM decision found for this project's methodology.

  • Removal or reduction

    Emission reduction or avoidance

    Prevents or reduces emissions — fits contribution claims, not SBTi neutralisation.

    Source: methodology

  • Paris Agreement (Article 6)

    No Article 6 authorization

    No corresponding adjustment: the host country can also count this reduction towards its own target.

    Source: registry label

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Registry labels last checked:2026-10-11

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2010
190,796138,69452,102
2011
620,872591,62429,248
2013
416,745416,324421
2014
209,048207,7161,332
2015
604,572604,003569
2016
426,823426,8230
2017
261,026252,9148,112
2018
617,226613,0694,157
2019
745,894742,7103,184
2020
781,606601,416180,190
Total4,874,6084,595,293279,315

Methodology versions used

The methodology version stated in each monitoring, verification and issuance document, by period, compared with the official methodology pages.

  1. 2010–2011VM0007version not confirmed in the document text

    monitoring report

  2. 2010–2013VM0007version not stated in the document

    verification report

  3. 2011–2013VM0007version not confirmed in the document text

    monitoring report + verification report

  4. 2013–2014VM0007version not stated in the document

    monitoring report + verification report

  5. 2014–2015VM0007version not confirmed in the document text

    monitoring report + verification report

  6. 2015–2017VM0007version not confirmed in the document text

    monitoring report + verification report

  7. 2017–2018VM0007 v1.4since replaced by v1.8

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  8. 2019VM0007 v1.4since replaced by v1.8

    verification report

    official page · verified on

  9. 2021–2023VM0007version not confirmed in the document text

    monitoring report

  10. Period not statedVM0007version not confirmed in the document text

    verification report

  • VM0007: Active (Verra / Verified Carbon Standard) · official page · verified on

A version is shown only when the document's own text writes it next to the methodology code. Current versions, status and CCP ranges come from the official pages linked, checked on the date shown.

Documents on the registry

Retired by

Organisations named as beneficiaries in the registry's public retirement records. (+223)

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating

Profile & governance

Analysis ProvenanceVM0007 REDD+ Methodology Framework (REDD-MF) version 1.4
Methodology·Editorial Policy·About the System

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected] →

Contest this rating

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Contest this rating →