Chakala Wind Power Project in Maharashtra
Developer: Bindu Vayu Urja Private Limited
#386of 5060 in Renewable energy#202of 2793 in India#289of 1573 in Verra (VCS)#292of 3458 in ACM0002
Assessment
Scale 0–10 · method weights: integrity 35% · transparency 25% · claim safety 25% · documentation 15%.
Findings
Risk Indicators
🔒
🔒
🔒
🔒
🔒
🔒
Score Breakdown
Score factors per dimension are a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium
Detailed Analysis
The detailed per-dimension analysis is a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium
Evidence
Eligibility & market
What can you claim with this credit?
Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).
Airlines (CORSIA)
No CORSIA label on the registry
Not usable for airlines' CORSIA obligations.
Source: registry label
Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)
Methodology not approved by ICVCMACM0002
The Integrity Council assessed this methodology as not meeting the Core Carbon Principles.
Source: ICVCM assessment
Removal or reduction
Emission reduction or avoidance
Prevents or reduces emissions — fits contribution claims, not SBTi neutralisation.
Source: project sector
Paris Agreement (Article 6)
No Article 6 authorization
No corresponding adjustment: the host country can also count this reduction towards its own target.
Source: registry label
Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.
Registry labels last checked:2026-10-11
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 76,534 | 76,534 | 0 | |
| 2014 | 62,121 | 62,121 | 0 | |
| 2015 | 69,656 | 69,656 | 0 | |
| 2016 | 72,674 | 72,674 | 0 | |
| 2017 | 62,121 | 58,344 | 3,777 | |
| 2018 | 69,899 | 69,899 | 0 | |
| 2019 | 68,888 | 68,888 | 0 | |
| 2020 | 46,322 | 6,375 | 39,947 | |
| 2021 | 58,486 | 0 | 58,486 | |
| Total | 586,701 | 484,491 | 102,210 |
Methodology versions used
The methodology version stated in each monitoring, verification and issuance document, by period, compared with the official methodology pages.
2011–2013ACM0002 v13.0since replaced by v22.0
monitoring report
official page · verified on
2013–2018ACM0002the documents for this period state different versions (v13.0, v13.0.3)
monitoring report + verification report
2018–2020ACM0002 v13.0.3since replaced by v22.0
monitoring report
official page · verified on
2020–2021ACM0002the documents for this period state different versions (v13.0, v13.0.3)
monitoring report + verification report
2021ACM0002the documents for this period state different versions (v13.0, v13.0.3)
monitoring report + verification report + issuance document
- ACM0002: Active (CDM / UNFCCC) · official page · verified on
A version is shown only when the document's own text writes it next to the methodology code. Current versions, status and CCP ranges come from the official pages linked, checked on the date shown.
Retired by
- DPDgroup19,555 t
- Active Tree Services17,394 t
- Charles Sturt University16,915 t
- Hitachi Construction Machinery (Australia) Pty Ltd14,078 t
- Maribyrnong City Council12,112 t
- Mawson Infrastructure Group Inc10,581 t
- Roe Highway Logistics Park7,318 t
- Austral Bricks (Tas) Pty Ltd6,000 t
- Uniting Communities Incorporated5,148 t
- Hitachi Construction Machinery5,095 t
Organisations named as beneficiaries in the registry's public retirement records. (+36)
Where to buy
Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →
+ Know where to buy this?
Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].
Profile & governance
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Contest this rating
Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.
Contest this rating →Share this rating
