CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
Tools
ProjectsDevelopersComparePortfolioCCP trackerA–Z index BuyersCORSIA supplyCheck an offerAPI & MCP Method About the System Editorial Policy Score Your Project
EN
Workbench ProjectsDevelopersComparePortfolioCCP trackerA–Z index
← All projects
ScoredVCSEnergy industries (renewable/non-renewable sources)BrazilRegistry: RegisteredAMS-I.E

J L Silva Ceramic Fuel Switching Project

VCS-198 ↗

Worked comparison example (English)

#42of 1734 in Industrial#23of 498 in Brazil#275of 1588 in Verra (VCS)#4of 106 in AMS-I.E

Assessment

CarbonMeld document-based assessment

01020304 Overall 6.7 / 10
Integrity 🔒 Transparency 🔒 Claim Safety 🔒 Documentation 🔒
Dimension scores are locked — the faint arcs are empty tracks, not zero scores.

Scale 0–10 · method weights: integrity 35% · transparency 25% · claim safety 25% · documentation 15%.

Scored2026-10-13medium confidenceLatest verified period ends: 2021-12-31

evidence: 26/37 registry documents read · 0 red flags

Generated by CarbonMeld Analysis Pipeline · Methodology · Editorial Policy · About the System
Download Report (PDF)

Analysis

J L Silva Ceramic Fuel Switching Project (Brazil) switches the user's thermal applications from non-renewable biomass to renewable energy (renewable biomass, 5.79 MW) under AMS-I.E version 07; registry status Registered (VCS), 402,072 credits issued (vintages 2006–2021). The documents name RINA Services S.p.A as validation / verification body. The latest verification report (01-October-2016 – 31-December-2021) verifies 138,781 tCO2e.

Red Flags

No red flags detected.

Findings

Risk Indicators

Additionality

🔒

Permanence

🔒

Leakage

🔒

Baseline

🔒

Safeguards

🔒

Double-claim

🔒

Risk indicator details are a Premium feature

Score Breakdown

Score factors per dimension are a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Detailed Analysis

The detailed per-dimension analysis is a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Evidence

Unlock the full analysis

Per-dimension scores, risk indicators, score factors, detailed analysis, and 37 registry documents (26 read).

€9+ VAT · 30-day pass · one-time, no auto-renewal

Every rated project, PDF reports, API access, portfolio alerts and per-dimension scores with red-flag details in side-by-side comparisons for 30 days (public-data comparison is free; fair use: 30 projects per day).

Price + VAT · By paying you accept the Terms of Use — digital content, no refunds. How Premium works

Eligibility & market

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

  • Airlines (CORSIA)

    No CORSIA label on the registry

    Not usable for airlines' CORSIA obligations.

    Source: registry label

  • Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)

    Methodology not approved by ICVCMAMS-I.E

    The Integrity Council assessed this methodology as not meeting the Core Carbon Principles.

    Source: ICVCM assessment

  • Removal or reduction

    Emission reduction or avoidance

    Prevents or reduces emissions — fits contribution claims, not SBTi neutralisation.

    Source: project sector

  • Paris Agreement (Article 6)

    No Article 6 authorization

    No corresponding adjustment: the host country can also count this reduction towards its own target.

    Source: registry label

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Registry labels last checked:2026-10-11

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2006
7,0097,0090
2007
28,28028,2800
2008
27,79727,7970
2009
28,00528,0050
2010
21,47221,4720
2011
20,90720,9070
2012
23,9487,19216,756
2013
28,24618,5619,685
2014
28,09314,04614,047
2015
28,86814,43414,434
2016
27,98010,33317,647
2017
26,892026,892
2018
26,029026,029
2019
26,109026,109
2020
27,628027,628
2021
24,809024,809
Total402,072198,036204,036

Methodology versions used

The methodology version stated in each monitoring, verification and issuance document, by period, compared with the official methodology pages.

  1. 2006–2008AMS-I.E v1.0since replaced by v14.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  2. 2008–2010AMS-I.E v1.0since replaced by v14.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  3. 2010–2012AMS-I.E v1.0since replaced by v14.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  4. 2012–2016AMS-I.E v1.0since replaced by v14.0

    monitoring report

    official page · verified on

  5. 2016–2021AMS-I.E v7.0since replaced by v14.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  • AMS-I.E: Active (CDM / UNFCCC) · official page · verified on

A version is shown only when the document's own text writes it next to the methodology code. Current versions, status and CCP ranges come from the official pages linked, checked on the date shown.

Documents on the registry

Retired by

Organisations named as beneficiaries in the registry's public retirement records.

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating

Profile & governance

Analysis ProvenanceAMS-I.E version 07
Methodology·Editorial Policy·About the System

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected] →

Contest this rating

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Contest this rating →