Skip to main content
CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
Tools
EN
ScoredVCSEnergy industries (renewable/non-renewable sources)TurkeyRegistry: RegisteredACM0002

Uluabat Hydroelectric Power Plant

Developer: Akenerji Elektrik Uretim A.S

VCS-536 ↗

#479of 5074 in Renewable energy#56of 431 in Türkiye#257of 1612 in Verra (VCS)#348of 3470 in ACM0002

Assessment

CarbonMeld document-based assessment

01020304 Overall 6.6 / 10 Dimension scores are locked — the faint arcs are empty tracks, not zero scores.

Scale 0–10 · method weights: integrity 35% · transparency 25% · claim safety 25% · documentation 15%.

Analysis

Uluabat Hydroelectric Power Plant (Turkey) generates grid-connected renewable electricity (run-of-river hydro) under ACM0002 version 20; registry status Registered (VCS), 1,585,955 credits issued (vintages 2010–2020). The documents name Bureau Veritas Certification Holding SAS as validation body, Earthood Services Private Limited as validator of the crediting-period renewal and RINA Services S.p.A (2010-10-27 – 2012-04-30), Earthood Services Private Limited (2018-04-01 – 2020-09-30) as verification bodies. The documents estimate 179,880 tCO2e per year. The verification report for the period (01/04/2018 – 30/09/2020) verifies 364,122 tCO2e.

Red Flags

No red flags detected.

Findings

Risk Indicators

Additionality

🔒

Permanence

🔒

Leakage

🔒

Baseline

🔒

Safeguards

🔒

Double-claim

🔒

Risk indicator details are a Premium feature

Score Breakdown

Score factors per dimension are a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Detailed Analysis

The detailed per-dimension analysis is a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Evidence

Unlock the full analysis

Per-dimension scores, risk indicators, score factors, detailed analysis, and 19 registry documents (13 read).

€9+ VAT · 30-day pass · one-time, no auto-renewal

Every rated project, PDF reports, API access, portfolio alerts and per-dimension scores with red-flag details in side-by-side comparisons for 30 days (public-data comparison is free; fair use: 30 projects per day).

Price + VAT · By paying you accept the Terms of Use — digital content, no refunds. How Premium works

Eligibility & market

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

  • Airlines (CORSIA)

    No CORSIA label on the registry

    Not usable for airlines' CORSIA obligations.

    Source: registry label

  • Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)

    Methodology not approved by ICVCMACM0002

    The Integrity Council assessed this methodology as not meeting the Core Carbon Principles.

    Source: ICVCM assessment

  • Removal or reduction

    Emission reduction or avoidance

    Prevents or reduces emissions — fits contribution claims, not SBTi neutralisation.

    Source: project sector

  • Paris Agreement (Article 6)

    No Article 6 authorization

    No corresponding adjustment: the host country can also count this reduction towards its own target.

    Source: registry label

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Registry labels last checked:2026-10-11

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2010
377,375377,3750
2012
173,286143,77729,509
2013
177,457177,4570
2014
72,78672,7860
2015
292,980269,44823,532
2016
233,537174,57758,960
2017
106,70235,09871,604
2018
35,76135,272489
2019
100,00063,88336,117
2020
16,07116,0710
Total1,585,9551,365,744220,211

Retired by

Organisations named as beneficiaries in the registry's public retirement records. (+68)

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

Profile & governance

Analysis ProvenanceACM0002 version 20

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected] →

Contest this rating

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Contest this rating →