Tag: Nature Based Solutions

New Zealand’s sovereign endorsement of voluntary nature and carbon markets could boost buyer confidence, integrity, and pricing for high-quality credits.

Farmland is emerging as a dual asset for biodiversity credits and voluntary nature markets, as UK rules create demand for off-site units and nature finance.

Forest carbon MRV is shifting from costly species mapping to biomass time series. Here is what buyers, developers, and MRV providers gain and lose.

Tropical rainforest loss fell 36% in 2025, but the world remains 70% above the pace needed for the 30x30 target. Here is what buyers, investors, and project developers should watch.

Nature-backed enterprises are moving toward investable asset class status as biodiversity credits, ecosystem services, and restoration finance attract private capital.

A UK utility’s $500 million forest carbon commitment could reset buyer expectations, strengthen project finance, and broaden demand for removals.

Brussels may merge LULUCF and ESR into one land-and-non-ETS framework. Here is what that could mean for farmers, foresters, buyers, and compliance markets.

Kazakhstan’s Article 6.2 forestry MoU signals market readiness for authorised forest removals, with implications for ITMOs, finance, and integrity.

An April 2026 analysis of how Microsoft's partnerships, long-term offtakes and repeat purchases shape nature-based carbon removal finance.

Biodiversity credits need bankable project structures, not just demand for nature. Learn why financing stalls and what makes projects investable.