GS3434 Uberlândia landfills I and II (GS-585) — score 3.7/10

Assessment

CarbonMeld document-based assessment

Integrity 🔒 Transparency 🔒 Claim Safety 🔒 Documentation 🔒

Dimension scores are locked — the faint arcs are empty tracks, not zero scores.

Scale 0–10 · method weights: integrity 35% · transparency 25% · claim safety 25% · documentation 15%.

Re-assessment pending · v2.1

How this analysis was made

Standard: Gold Standard (GS) How our current method reads projects of this standard
Methodology: ACM0001 How our current method reads projects of this type
Our method: CarbonMeld methodology v2.1 · analysed on 4 Sep 2026 · 52/54 registry documents analyzed · re-assessment under v2.2 pending

Analysis

The Uberlândia landfill biogas project has a verified additionality assessment and no reported reversal events, but the verification report reveals an extensive list of over 30 material findings including calculation errors, formula inconsistencies with the methodology, calibration delays, and unreported engine failures. Multiple contradictions across documents—particularly in the ex-ante lifetime estimate, crediting period start date, and verified ERR figures—undermine confidence in the credit quantities. The 0% leakage deduction for a landfill project, absence of a buffer pool, and non-conducted FPIC further weaken the integrity profile.

Red Flags

5 red flags detected — Unlock with Premium

Findings

Risk Indicators

Additionality

🔒

Permanence

🔒

Leakage

🔒

Baseline

🔒

Safeguards

🔒

Double-claim

🔒

Risk indicator details are a Premium feature

Score Breakdown

Score factors per dimension are a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Gates applied

The gates applied to this score are a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Detailed Analysis

The detailed per-dimension analysis is a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Evidence

Unlock the full analysis

On this page: the analysis of 4 Sep 2026, marked “Re-assessment pending”. Per-dimension scores, risk indicators, 5 red flags, score factors, detailed analysis, and 54 registry documents (52 analyzed).

€9+ VAT per month · card subscription, renews automatically until you cancel

Every rated project, PDF reports, API access, portfolio alerts and per-dimension scores with red-flag details in side-by-side comparisons (public-data comparison is free; fair use: 30 projects per day). Cancel any time from your account page. Crypto: $9 for one month, no automatic renewal.

Price + VAT · By subscribing or paying you accept the Terms of Use — the card subscription renews every month until you cancel; digital content, no refunds. How Premium works

Eligibility & market

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

Airlines (CORSIA)
No CORSIA label on the registry
Not usable for airlines' CORSIA obligations.
Source: registry label · read on 2 Nov 2026
Covers: this project's credit records as read on the registry
Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)
CCP-labelled credits
The registry marks credits of this project with the Integrity Council's Core Carbon Principles label: check that the units offered carry it.
Source: registry label · read on 2 Nov 2026
Covers: credits of this project that carry the label on the registry — not every unit or lot
Removal or reduction
Emission reduction or avoidance
Prevents or reduces emissions — fits contribution claims, not SBTi neutralisation.
Source: registry label · read on 2 Nov 2026
Covers: the project type, not a label on individual credits
Paris Agreement (Article 6)
Not published
This registry does not publish Article 6 authorizations.

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Registry labels last checked:2026-11-02

Credit Vintages

	Issued	Retired	Available
2013	97,715	20,812	76,903
2014	306,192	148,096	158,096
2015	236,301	112,866	123,435
2016	188,268	91,661	96,607
2017	237,452	118,726	118,726
2018	214,232	76,117	138,115
2019	127,404	44,436	82,968
2020	278,170	132,002	146,168
2021	178,145	178,145	0
2022	209,410	209,410	0
2023	207,705	106,019	101,686
2024	198,985	194,659	4,326
Total	2,479,979	1,432,949	1,047,030

Methodology versions used

The methodology version stated in each monitoring, verification and issuance document, by period, compared with the official methodology pages.

2013–2015ACM0001version not confirmed in the document text
verification report
2016–2019ACM0001 v12.0since replaced by v19.0
monitoring report + verification report
official page · verified on2026-10-01
outside the ICVCM CCP-approved range (GS: 15.0-19.0) · official page · verified on2026-10-01
2016–2020ACM0001 v18.1since replaced by v19.0
monitoring report
official page · verified on2026-10-01
in the ICVCM CCP-approved range (GS: 15.0-19.0) · official page · verified on2026-10-01
2019–2020ACM0001 v18.1since replaced by v19.0
monitoring report + verification report
official page · verified on2026-10-01
in the ICVCM CCP-approved range (GS: 15.0-19.0) · official page · verified on2026-10-01
2020ACM0001 v18.1since replaced by v19.0
monitoring report + verification report
official page · verified on2026-10-01
in the ICVCM CCP-approved range (GS: 15.0-19.0) · official page · verified on2026-10-01
2020ACM0001 v18.1since replaced by v19.0
monitoring report
official page · verified on2026-10-01
in the ICVCM CCP-approved range (GS: 15.0-19.0) · official page · verified on2026-10-01
2021–2022ACM0001 v18.1since replaced by v19.0
monitoring report + verification report
official page · verified on2026-10-01
in the ICVCM CCP-approved range (GS: 15.0-19.0) · official page · verified on2026-10-01
2023ACM0001 v18.1since replaced by v19.0
monitoring report + verification report
official page · verified on2026-10-01
in the ICVCM CCP-approved range (GS: 15.0-19.0) · official page · verified on2026-10-01
2024ACM0001 v18.1since replaced by v19.0
monitoring report + verification report
official page · verified on2026-10-01
in the ICVCM CCP-approved range (GS: 15.0-19.0) · official page · verified on2026-10-01
2024ACM0001 v19.0current version
monitoring report + verification report
official page · verified on2026-10-01
in the ICVCM CCP-approved range (GS: 15.0-19.0) · official page · verified on2026-10-01
2025ACM0001 v19.0current version
monitoring report + verification report
official page · verified on2026-10-01
in the ICVCM CCP-approved range (GS: 15.0-19.0) · official page · verified on2026-10-01
Period not statedACM0001version not confirmed in the document text
monitoring report

ACM0001: Active (CDM / UNFCCC) · official page · verified on2026-10-01

Being within an ICVCM-approved version range is information only: it does not mean these credits carry the CCP label, which the registry assigns to each issuance.

A version is shown only when the document's own text writes it next to the methodology code. Current versions, status and CCP ranges come from the official pages linked, checked on the date shown.

Documents on the registry

Retired by

Eni Plenitude spa Società Benefit300,000 t
Salesforce, Inc223,786 t
Grupo Santander/Otros Negocios15,000 t
Inter-American Development Bank Group7,750 t
MINOR HOTELS EUROPE & AMERICAS S.A4,500 t
Santander Consumer Bank AG4,500 t
GP-025-Maxol2,297 t
Banco Santander (Brasil) S.A742 t
Ministry of Trade and Industry Singapore678 t
Banco Santander de Negocios Colombia S.A56 t

Organisations named as beneficiaries in the registry's public retirement records. (+3)

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating

Profile & governance

Methodology·Editorial Policy·About the System

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected] →

Contest this rating

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Contest this rating →

Similar projects

Same methodology or sector, the same registry first.

GS3434 Uberlândia landfills I and II

How this analysis was made

Analysis

Red Flags

Risk Indicators

What would improve this score

Score Breakdown

Gates applied

Detailed Analysis

Registry Documents

What can you claim with this credit?

Credit Vintages

Methodology versions used

Retired by

Where to buy

Project Description

Are you the project owner?

Similar projects

How this analysis was made

Analysis

Red Flags

Risk Indicators

What would improve this score

Score Breakdown

Gates applied

Detailed Analysis

Registry Documents

What can you claim with this credit?

Credit Vintages

Methodology versions used

Retired by

Where to buy

Project Description

Are you the project owner?

Share this rating

Similar projects