Skip to main content
CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
Tools
EN
Rankings · methodology

Top ECY-ODS projects

25 rated projects in this methodology · average score 3.6/10 · ranked by CarbonMeld's document-based assessment scores across all four dimensions: integrity, transparency, claim safety and documentation.

← All leaderboards · Full database

What you're looking at

This page ranks projects using ECY-ODS by their CarbonMeld document-based assessment scores. The rank compares project assessments; it is not a rating of the methodology itself.

CarbonMeld scores assess integrity, transparency, claim safety and documentation using project documents. Higher scores indicate stronger evidence under this framework. How to read CarbonMeld scores.

Project names, codes and registry status come from official registry records. Open a project dossier for its source record. Registry / standard: ACR · Climate Action Reserve .

ECY-ODS: Destruction of Ozone Depleting Substances Protocol

Methodology issuer: Washington State Department of Ecology · Official methodology page.

Description not yet reviewed against the official text.

#1Tradewater ODS 67CARUnited StatesIndustrial gasesRegistry: Registered↻ Re-assessment pending5.7/10#2A-Gas 2-2025CARUnited StatesIndustrial gasesRegistry: Registered↻ Re-assessment pending5.5/10▲+3.4#3Tradewater ODS 52ACRUnited StatesIndustrial gasesRegistry: Crediting ended↻ Re-assessment pending5.5/10▲+0.2
  1. 4
    Tradewater ODS 63CARUnited StatesIndustrial gasesRegistry: Registered↻ Re-assessment pending
    5.4
  2. 5
    Tradewater ODS 65CARUnited StatesIndustrial gasesRegistry: Registered↻ Re-assessment pending
    5.4
  3. 6
    A-Gas 2-2024ACRUnited StatesIndustrial gasesRegistry: Crediting ended↻ Re-assessment pending
    5.2▲+0.9
  4. 7
    A-Gas 2-2023ACRUnited StatesIndustrial gasesRegistry: Crediting ended↻ Re-assessment pending
    5.1
  5. 8
    Tradewater ODS 51ACRUnited StatesIndustrial gasesRegistry: Crediting ended↻ Re-assessment pending
    5▼-0.4
  6. 9
    Tradewater ODS 62CARUnited StatesIndustrial gasesRegistry: Registered↻ Re-assessment pending
    5
  7. 10
    Tradewater ODS 64CARUnited StatesIndustrial gasesRegistry: Registered↻ Re-assessment pending
    5
  8. 11
    Tradewater ODS 59ACRUnited StatesIndustrial gasesRegistry: Registered↻ Re-assessment pending
    4.2▲+1.2
  9. 12
    Tradewater ODS 68CARUnited StatesIndustrial gasesRegistry: Registered↻ Re-assessment pending
    4.2▲+2.7
  10. 13
    Tradewater ODS 66CARUnited StatesIndustrial gasesRegistry: Registered↻ Re-assessment pending
    3.7
  11. 14
    A-Gas 3-2023ACRUnited StatesIndustrial gasesRegistry: Inactive↻ Re-assessment pending
    3.2▲+0.9
  12. 15
    A-Gas 2-2026CARUnited StatesIndustrial gasesRegistry: Registered↻ Re-assessment pending
    3▲+1.5
  13. 16
    Tradewater ODS 58ACRUnited StatesIndustrial gasesRegistry: Crediting ended↻ Re-assessment pending
    3▲+0.1
  14. 17
    A-Gas 1-2026CARUnited StatesIndustrial gasesRegistry: Registered↻ Re-assessment pending
    2.6▲+0.3
  15. 18
    Tradewater ODS 60ACRUnited StatesIndustrial gasesRegistry: Registered↻ Re-assessment pending
    2.5▼-0.3
  16. 19
    A-Gas 1-2025ACRUnited StatesIndustrial gasesRegistry: Registered↻ Re-assessment pending
    2.1▼-1.1
  17. 20
    Tradewater ODS 53ACRUnited StatesIndustrial gasesRegistry: Inactive↻ Re-assessment pending
    2▲+0.2
  18. 21
    Hudson Tech 2025-3 WashingtonACRUnited StatesIndustrial gasesRegistry: Registered↻ Re-assessment pending
    1.6▼-0.4
  19. 22
    Hudson Tech 2025-2 WashingtonACRUnited StatesIndustrial gasesRegistry: Registered↻ Re-assessment pending
    1.5▼-1.1
  20. 23
    Tradewater ODS 61ACRUnited StatesIndustrial gasesRegistry: Inactive↻ Re-assessment pending
    1.5▼-1.1
  21. 24
    Hudson Tech 2026-1 WashingtonACRUnited StatesIndustrial gasesRegistry: Registered↻ Re-assessment pending
    1.4▼-1.1
  22. 25
    Hudson Tech 2026-2 WashingtonACRUnited StatesIndustrial gasesRegistry: Crediting ended↻ Re-assessment pending
    0.7

Rank is by document-based assessment score only. The registry status shown next to each project is a separate fact: inclusion in this ranking is not a statement of current validity or credit eligibility — projects suspended, withdrawn or terminated by their registry can still appear, with their status labelled. Read the methodology.