Top ARB-ODS projects
228 rated projects in this methodology · average score 4.1/10 · ranked by CarbonMeld's document-based assessment scores across all four dimensions: integrity, transparency, claim safety and documentation. Showing the top 50 — filter the full table for the rest.
What you're looking at
This page ranks projects using ARB-ODS by their CarbonMeld document-based assessment scores. The rank compares project assessments; it is not a rating of the methodology itself.
CarbonMeld scores assess integrity, transparency, claim safety and documentation using project documents. Higher scores indicate stronger evidence under this framework. How to read CarbonMeld scores.
Project names, codes and registry status come from official registry records. Open a project dossier for its source record. Registry / standard: ACR · Climate Action Reserve .
ARB-ODS: Compliance Offset Protocol Ozone Depleting Substances (ODS) Projects
Methodology issuer: California Air Resources Board · Official methodology page.
Industrial gases · Emission reductions
Projects destroy high global warming potential ozone depleting substances used as foam blowing agents and refrigerants, sourced from and destroyed within the United States, that would otherwise be released to the atmosphere. Each substance must be documented, chemically analysed, quantified and destroyed at a qualifying facility.
- 46.8▲+2.3
- 56.6▲+0.8
- 66.6▲+1.6
- 76.5▲+2.2
- 86.4▲+2.7
- 96.3▲+0.5
- 106.2▲+1.1
- 116.2▲+0.6
- 126.1▼-0.4
- 136.1▼-0.6
- 146▼-1.3
- 156▲+0.8
- 165.9▲+0.5
- 175.9▲+1.9
- 185.8▲+1.4
- 195.8▲+1.0
- 205.8▲+0.7
- 215.8▲+1.9
- 225.8▲+2.0
- 235.6▼-0.1
- 245.6▲+0.5
- 255.6▲+0.8
- 265.6▲+0.5
- 275.6▲+1.7
- 285.6▲+0.7
- 295.5▲+2.6
- 305.5▼-0.9
- 315.5
- 325.5▲+1.2
- 335.4▲+1.6
- 345.4▲+1.4
- 355.4▲+0.3
- 365.4▲+1.5
- 375.4▲+0.2
- 385.4▲+1.0
- 395.4
- 405.4▼-0.1
- 415.4▲+0.4
- 425.4▲+1.5
- 435.3▲+0.3
- 445.3▼-0.4
- 455.3▲+0.5
- 465.3▲+1.6
- 475.3▲+1.5
- 485.3▼-0.5
- 495.3▲+0.4
- 505.2▲+0.7
Rank is by document-based assessment score only. The registry status shown next to each project is a separate fact: inclusion in this ranking is not a statement of current validity or credit eligibility — projects suspended, withdrawn or terminated by their registry can still appear, with their status labelled. Read the methodology.