CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
Workbench ProjectsDevelopersComparePortfolioCCP trackerA–Z index

Rated

EOS ACR 356

Standard
ACR
Methodology
ARB-ODS (California Air Resources Board)
Registry
ACR-356 ↗ · Crediting ended
Country
ARKANSAS, US
Credit type
Ozone Depleting Substances
Developer
EOS Climate Inc
Worked comparison example (English)

CarbonMeld's document-based rating gives EOS ACR 356 (ACR-356) 4.4 out of 10 (Low rating) under CarbonMeld methodology v3, documents read on 2 Nov 2026. The analysis read 3 of the 3 registry documents. It is CarbonMeld's own assessment, not a rating given by the registry or the standard.

Crediting ended

The crediting period has ended. Credits already issued exist; no new ones will be issued unless the crediting period is renewed.

American Carbon Registry: “COMPLETED”

Assessment

CarbonMeld document-based rating

010203 Document-based rating 4.4 / 10
Additionality 🔒 Quantification 🔒 Claim safety 🔒
The dimension values are in Premium — the faint arcs are empty tracks, not zero values.

Document-based rating

4.4/10

Low rating (3.5 to 4.9)

Evidence coverage: medium

How solid the credit is, as far as the registry's public documents show. 5.0 is the neutral point, where no public source says good or bad.

Methodology v3 · documents read on 2 Nov 2026

Starting point

  • Additionality: neutral (5.0) — no public grade of this type of project is used
  • Quantification: neutral (5.0) — no public grade of this type of project is used
  • Claim safety: neutral (5.0) — no public grade of this type of project is used

Rules that lowered the number: 1

Each rule, with the fact and the source it rests on, is in the Premium analysis.

Not counted in the number

  • The oldest vintage still on sale, the content of the safeguards and the verifier's quality: not among the facts read

Analysed on 2 Nov 2026Latest verified period ends:

evidence: 3/3 registry documents read

Generated by CarbonMeld Analysis Pipeline · Methodology · Editorial Policy · About the System
Download Report (PDF)

How this analysis was made

Standard
American Carbon Registry (ACR)
Methodology
Compliance Offset Protocol Ozone Depleting Substances Projects, November 14, 2014 How our current method reads projects of this type
Our method
CarbonMeld methodology v3 · documents read on 2 Nov 2026 · 3/3 registry documents read

Analysis

EOS ACR 356 (ARKANSAS, US) destroys ozone depleting substances sourced in the United States that would otherwise have been released under Compliance Offset Protocol Ozone Depleting Substances Projects, November 14, 2014; registry status Crediting ended (ACR), 110,720 credits issued (vintage 2016). The documents name SES, Inc as validation / verification body. The latest verification report (2016-12-02 – 2016-12-28) verifies 110,720 tCO2e (read from a scanned page (OCR)).

Eligibility & market

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

  • Airlines (CORSIA)

    No CORSIA label on the registry

    Not usable for airlines' CORSIA obligations.

    Source: registry label · read on 12 Nov 2026

    Covers: this project's credit records as read on the registry

  • Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)

    Methodology approved for some versionsACR Destruction of Ozone Depleting Substances

    The Integrity Council approved some versions of this protocol and not others: check which version the project uses before claiming CCP quality.

    Source: ICVCM assessment · ICVCM table read on 4 Nov 2026

    Covers: the methodology (every project using it), not this project's credits

  • Removal or reduction

    Not determined

    The registry data do not say whether these credits are removals or reductions.

  • Paris Agreement (Article 6)

    No Article 6 authorization

    No corresponding adjustment: the host country can also count this reduction towards its own target.

    Source: registry label · read on 12 Nov 2026

    Covers: this project's credit records as read on the registry

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Credit VintagesExhausted

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2016
110,72000
Total110,72000

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at listings@carbonmeld.com.

⚑ Contest this rating

Profile & governance

Methodology·Editorial Policy·About the System·Carbon credit ratings explained·Carbon credit due diligence checklist

Are you the project owner?

Full analysis (free for owners)

Owners get free access to the full analysis of their own project: every rule that raised or lowered the number, with the fact and the source it rests on, the negative facts' detail and the documents read. Write to us from your organisation's email address.

hello@carbonmeld.com →

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the rating.

hello@carbonmeld.com →

Contest this rating

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Contest this rating →

Cite this page

CarbonMeld (2026). EOS ACR 356 (ACR-356): CarbonMeld document-based rating, methodology v3, documents read on 2 Nov 2026. https://carbonmeld.com/projects/eos-acr-356/.

The citation names the rating by its methodology version and the day the documents were read.

Unlock the full analysis

The dimension values of the rating, every rule that raised or lowered the number with the fact and the source it rests on, the negative facts' detail and quotes, and 3 registry documents (3 read).

€9+ VAT per month · card subscription, renews automatically until you cancel

Every rated project, PDF reports, API access, portfolio alerts and the dimension values in side-by-side comparisons, when every rated project is on the same version of our methodology (public-data comparison, the negative facts included, is free; fair use: 30 projects per day, or 300 with Pro at €49 + VAT per month). Cancel any time from your account page. Crypto: $9 for one month, no automatic renewal.

Enter your email to pay with crypto

Price + VAT · By subscribing or paying you accept the Terms of Use — the card subscription renews every month until you cancel; digital content, no refunds. How Premium works

Similar projects

Same methodology or sector, the same registry first.