CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
Project database · methodology

ISOMETRIC-REFORESTATION carbon credit projects

Browse 8 published projects using ISOMETRIC-REFORESTATION, listed alphabetically. There is no ranking for this methodology yet: it appears here automatically once 5 of its projects are rated. Open a project to view its registry details and the analysis available for that project.

← All leaderboards and methodology lists · Project database

What you're looking at

This is an alphabetical list of published projects using ISOMETRIC-REFORESTATION. There are not yet 5 projects with a current score and a registry status eligible for ranking. Some projects may already have an assessment; each dossier shows the analysis available.

CarbonMeld scores assess integrity, transparency, claim safety and documentation using project documents. Higher scores indicate stronger evidence under this framework. How to read CarbonMeld scores.

Project names, codes and registry status come from official registry records. Open a project dossier for its source record.

ISOMETRIC-REFORESTATION: Reforestation

Methodology issuer: Isometric · Official methodology page.

Forestry · CO2 removals

Projects reforest land. The protocol sets how to calculate the net carbon dioxide this removes from the atmosphere.

Version 1.2 · version verified on

How CarbonMeld reads projects of this type

Versions of the official text these rules cover: 1.2

What CarbonMeld reads

  • Additionality: the project must show it with a test. CarbonMeld reads the test in the documents.
  • Leakage: the methodology sets rules for it (Reforestation v1.2 summary, p. 1). CarbonMeld reads it in the project's documents.
  • Buffer pool: the methodology sets rules for it. CarbonMeld reads it in the project's documents.
  • Permanence and reversals: the methodology sets rules for it (Reforestation v1.2 §5.4, p. 1). CarbonMeld reads it in the project's documents.

Deductions that can apply

  • REDD+ and reforestation: if the documents read do not address leakage, CarbonMeld lowers integrity by 1.5 and shows a red flag. At the listing stage, the gate does not apply when the programme's listing form has no section on leakage.
  • REDD+ and reforestation: if the documents read do not state the buffer pool share, CarbonMeld shows a red flag. It lowers no score. At the listing stage, there is no flag when the programme's listing form has no section on the buffer pool.

Set by the methodology, not assessed in this analysis

  • No legal requirement for the activity: the methodology sets rules for it. This analysis does not assess it.
  • Social safeguards and consent of communities (FPIC): the methodology sets rules for it. This analysis does not assess it.

Not applicable to this type — never a gap in our current method

  • Grid emission factor: the criterion does not apply to this methodology. Our current method never counts it as a gap.
  • Fraction of non-renewable biomass (fNRB): the criterion does not apply to this methodology. Our current method never counts it as a gap.
  • Usage rate of the devices: the criterion does not apply to this methodology. Our current method never counts it as a gap.
  • Durability of the storage: the criterion does not apply to this methodology. Our current method never counts it as a gap.
  • Sustainability of the feedstock: the criterion does not apply to this methodology. Our current method never counts it as a gap.
  • Tracking of the end use: the criterion does not apply to this methodology. Our current method never counts it as a gap.

The general rules apply as well. Read the general rules.

Listed alphabetically, not ranked. A methodology leaderboard is computed automatically once 5 of its projects have a current CarbonMeld score and a rankable registry status (projects still in the pipeline or under validation are not ranked). Read the methodology.