ISOCarbon RemovalGeneral Methodologyv2.1

Reforesting the Brazilian Amazon Project 1

ISO-1KA95092G1S0 ↗

#43of 52 in ISO

2.8/ 10
Integrity
4.0
Transparency
1.0
Claim Safety
3.5
Documentation
2.0

Scored2026-09-02medium confidence

Generated by CarbonMeld Analysis Pipeline · Methodology · Editorial Policy · About the System
Download Report (PDF)

Audit Analysis

The Reforesting the Brazilian Amazon Project 1 record is extremely thin, consisting solely of a project design document with no verification reports, monitoring data, or independent VVB confirmation. While an investment additionality test is referenced and no material findings or corrective actions are noted, the 100-year permanence claim lacks a stated buffer pool, the baseline is project-specific with no reassessment date, and FPIC was not conducted. The absence of any verified emission reduction figures or monitoring data makes it impossible to assess whether the project is delivering on its claims.

Red Flags

  • 100-year permanence claim with no buffer pool percentage stated and no reversal-event data available for a reforestation project in the Brazilian Amazon, where fire and land-use change risk is significant
  • FPIC (Free, Prior, and Informed Consent) was not conducted despite the project being a reforestation initiative in the Brazilian Amazon, raising Indigenous and community rights concerns
  • No independent VVB verification of additionality is on record; the investment test is referenced in the PDD but no verification report or VVB name is available
  • Zero leakage deduction is justified as 'quantified' but no quantification detail, methodology, or supporting data is present in the available record

Credit Vintages

Issuance data not yet available — check back soon.

Risk Indicators

Additionality

Investment test in PDD but no VVB verification on record

Permanence

100-year claim, no buffer pool stated, no reversal data

Leakage

0% deduction labelled quantified but no supporting detail

Baseline

Project-specific baseline, no reassessment date

Safeguards

Grievance mechanism and benefit sharing present, but FPIC not conducted

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status both unstated

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-09-02General Methodology v2.1
Methodology·Editorial Policy·About the System

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected] →

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents →