Skip to main content
ISOCarbon RemovalGeneral Methodologyv2.1

U.S. Agroforestry & Reforestation using Long-term Leases

ISO-1JYDZZ4MS1S0 ↗

#43of 54 in ARR (afforestation)#35of 52 in ISO

3.8/ 10
Integrity
4.8
Transparency
2.5
Claim Safety
4.0
Documentation
3.0

Audit Analysis

This U.S. reforestation project under the Isometric standard presents a reasonable structural design (jurisdictional baseline, 10.6% buffer pool, combined additionality test) but suffers from a severe evidence gap: only a PDD and stakeholder consultation are available, with no verification report, monitoring data, or VVB confirmation. The absence of FPIC for a long-term lease project and the lack of any quantified leakage figure are notable integrity concerns.

Red Flags

  • FPIC was not conducted despite the project relying on long-term land leases, raising consent and benefit-sharing concerns
  • No VVB name or verification confirmation is found in the extracted record, leaving additionality and baseline claims unverified
  • Leakage is described as 'quantified' in the PDD but no actual deduction percentage is stated in the available documents
  • No monitoring report or verification report is present; all ERR figures (claimed and verified) are absent

Credit Vintages

Issuance data not yet available — check back soon.

Risk Indicators

Additionality

Combined test stated but VVB verification not confirmed

Permanence

10.6% buffer pool present; no reversal data available

Leakage

Described as quantified but no percentage stated

Baseline

Jurisdictional method; reassessment date not stated

Safeguards

Grievance mechanism present; FPIC not conducted

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated in available documents

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-09-02General Methodology v2.1

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents