U.S. Agroforestry & Reforestation using Long-term Leases
#43of 54 in ARR (afforestation)#35of 52 in ISO
Audit Analysis
This U.S. reforestation project under the Isometric standard presents a reasonable structural design (jurisdictional baseline, 10.6% buffer pool, combined additionality test) but suffers from a severe evidence gap: only a PDD and stakeholder consultation are available, with no verification report, monitoring data, or VVB confirmation. The absence of FPIC for a long-term lease project and the lack of any quantified leakage figure are notable integrity concerns.
Red Flags
- FPIC was not conducted despite the project relying on long-term land leases, raising consent and benefit-sharing concerns
- No VVB name or verification confirmation is found in the extracted record, leaving additionality and baseline claims unverified
- Leakage is described as 'quantified' in the PDD but no actual deduction percentage is stated in the available documents
- No monitoring report or verification report is present; all ERR figures (claimed and verified) are absent
Credit Vintages
Issuance data not yet available — check back soon.
Risk Indicators
Combined test stated but VVB verification not confirmed
10.6% buffer pool present; no reversal data available
Described as quantified but no percentage stated
Jurisdictional method; reassessment date not stated
Grievance mechanism present; FPIC not conducted
CORSIA and CCP status not stated in available documents
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →