Skip to main content
CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
Tools
EN
Rankings · methodology

Top VM0043 projects

5 rated projects of the 14 tracked in this methodology · average score 5.1/10 · ranked by CarbonMeld's document-based assessment scores across all four dimensions: integrity, transparency, claim safety and documentation.

← All leaderboards · Full database

What you're looking at

This page ranks projects using VM0043 by their CarbonMeld document-based assessment scores. The rank compares project assessments; it is not a rating of the methodology itself.

CarbonMeld scores assess integrity, transparency, claim safety and documentation using project documents. Higher scores indicate stronger evidence under this framework. How to read CarbonMeld scores.

Project names, codes and registry status come from official registry records. Open a project dossier for its source record. Registry / standard: Verra / VCS .

VM0043: CO2 Utilization in Concrete Production

Methodology issuer: Verra / Verified Carbon Standard · Official methodology page.

Concrete · Emission reductions and CO2 removals

Projects incorporate CO2 into concrete and can reduce the cement needed to make it. The method accounts for CO2 retained in the material and emissions avoided in production.

Version 1.1 · Active at Verra / Verified Carbon Standard · status verified on

Version and status refer to the methodology at its issuer. Individual projects may use different versions; these facts do not establish credit eligibility in other programs.

#1USING DIRECT AIR CAPTURE TO MANUFACTURE CARBON-NEGATIVE CONCRETEVCSBahamasDACRegistry: Registered5.6/10▲+2.3#2CO2 UTILIZATION IN CONCRETE - REMOVALS & REDUCTIONS – CarbonCure – Asia #1VCSSingaporeOtherRegistry: Registered5.4/10▲+0.1#3CO2 Utilization in Concrete – Removals & Reductions – CarbonCure – U.S & Canada Project #1VCSBoliviaOtherRegistry: Registered5.4/10▲+0.5
  1. 4
    PRODUCTION OF CONCRETE WITH CO2 CAPTURE AND CEMENT REDUCTIONVCSUnited StatesOtherRegistry: Registered
    4.8▲+0.7
  2. 54.3▼-1.9

Rank is by document-based assessment score only. The registry status shown next to each project is a separate fact: inclusion in this ranking is not a statement of current validity or credit eligibility — projects suspended, withdrawn or terminated by their registry can still appear, with their status labelled. Read the methodology.