1.2 MW Wind Power Project in Maharashtra
#996of 1935 in Renewable energy#504of 975 in India#716of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)#320of 806 in AMS-I.D
Audit Analysis
A small 1.2 MW wind project in Maharashtra validated under CDM in 2010 with a jurisdictional grid baseline and investment-test additionality confirmed by TÜV NORD CERT. The project type carries inherently low permanence and leakage risk, but the validation report records eight material findings on the additionality worksheet, and the available record lacks any monitoring-period data, verified ERR, or FNRB information. Overall, the project is structurally sound for a wind avoidance credit but is hampered by sparse documentation and low extraction confidence.
Red Flags
- Eight material findings in the validation report (2010) flag non-conformities in the additionality analysis, including a common-practice analysis that did not follow Step 4 of the Additionality Tool and O&M costs reckoned from the wrong year; although no corrective actions were ultimately required, the density of findings warrants caution.
- No monitoring-period data, verified ERR, or FNRB value is present in the extracted record, making it impossible to confirm that actual generation matched the ex-ante estimate of 19,390 tCO₂.
- Two contradictions between the validation report and an appendix (leakage treatment and crediting-period dates) reduce confidence in the internal consistency of the project file.
- Minimum extraction confidence is rated low, indicating at least one key document was poorly readable.
Credit Vintages
No issuances recorded on the registry.
Risk Indicators
VVB-confirmed but 8 material findings in worksheet
Avoidance project, no reversal risk
0 % deemed negligible, appropriate for grid wind
Jurisdictional grid EF, standard for wind
Safeguards and benefit sharing mentioned; FPIC and grievance mechanism not stated
CORSIA and CCP status not stated in available documents
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →