Skip to main content
CDMBiomass EnergyIndiaAMS-I.D

10 MW Biomass based power Plant at Pollachi,Coimbatore district, Tamil Nadu

CDM-5313 ↗

#169of 352 in Biomass#751of 975 in India#1127of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)#455of 806 in AMS-I.D

4.5/ 10
Integrity
5.5
Transparency
3.0
Claim Safety
5.0
Documentation
3.5

Audit Analysis

A 10 MW biomass power plant in Tamil Nadu, India, validated under CDM AMS-I.D with a VVB-confirmed investment additionality test and a jurisdictional grid baseline. However, the available record is limited to the validation report and PDD, with no verification or monitoring reports, no verified emission reductions, and several inter-document inconsistencies that reduce confidence in the data. The project's core design is sound, but the absence of post-validation evidence and the low extraction confidence leave significant gaps in assessing actual performance.

Red Flags

  • No verification reports or monitoring reports are present in the extracted record; total verified emission reductions are not available, making it impossible to confirm actual credit delivery against the claimed 46,983 tCO₂/yr (or 328,881 tCO₂ lifetime).
  • The PDD states a total ERR of 328,881 while the validation report states 46,983; although 46,983 × 7 years = 328,881 suggests an annual-versus-lifetime labelling difference, the two documents do not clearly distinguish the basis, creating ambiguity for any downstream user.
  • The appendix describes the baseline as 'project-specific' and leakage as 'quantified,' while the validation report (the authoritative VVB document) records a jurisdictional baseline and leakage deemed negligible — an unresolved inconsistency that weakens confidence in the baseline and leakage treatment.
  • Minimum extraction confidence is rated 'low,' indicating at least one key document was poorly readable, which compounds the already thin evidentiary base.

Credit Vintages

No issuances recorded on the registry.

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed investment test

Permanence

mixed evidence / unresolved risk

Leakage

0% deemed negligible; appendix conflict unresolved

Baseline

Jurisdictional per VVB; appendix says project-specific

Safeguards

Safeguards and benefit sharing mentioned; no FPIC or grievance mechanism

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-09-01AMS-I.D

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents