10 MW Biomass (Rice Husk) Based Power Generation Unit of M/s Rukmani Power and Steel Ltd.(RPSL)
#148of 352 in Biomass#712of 975 in India#1058of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)#431of 806 in AMS-I.D
Audit Analysis
This CDM biomass power generation project (10 MW rice husk, India) was verified by DNV but carries 19 material findings and 25 corrective actions spanning baseline calculation, leakage treatment, and monitoring plan deficiencies. The project delivered roughly 84% of its ex-ante annual estimate over the full crediting period, which is conservative, but contradictions between the validation and monitoring reports on baseline method and leakage treatment undermine confidence in the underlying assumptions. Documentation quality is a significant weakness, with the PDD containing outdated references, incomplete technical sections, and monitoring gaps inconsistent with AMS-I.D v17.
Red Flags
- 19 material findings identified in the monitoring report, including grid emission factor calculation errors (weights wOM=0.25, wBM=0.75 not clearly applied) and an unsupported 75:25 biomass-to-coal ratio
- Contradiction between validation report (leakage deemed negligible) and monitoring report (leakage quantified), with a material finding that competing-use leakage was not clearly addressed in the updated PDD
- Contradiction on baseline method: validation report states 'jurisdictional' while the monitoring report states 'project', creating ambiguity about the baseline's robustness
- No verified ERR figure available in the extracted record, preventing independent confirmation of the 215,150 tCO2e claimed over the crediting period
- Monitoring plan lacked calibration procedures, measurement accuracy specifications, and equipment descriptions for biomass and coal inputs, inconsistent with AMS-I.D v17 requirements
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 42,613 | 0 | 42,613 | |
| 2012 | 93,227 | 0 | 93,227 | |
| 2013 | 70,352 | 0 | 70,352 | |
| Total | 206,192 | 0 | 206,192 |
Risk Indicators
Combined test applied but VVB confirmation not explicitly stated in record
No reversal events; power-generation avoidance project
Contradictory treatment; competing-use leakage not clearly addressed
Project-specific baseline; grid EF calculation errors; method contradiction
Safeguards and benefit sharing mentioned; FPIC and grievance mechanism not stated
CORSIA and CCP status not stated in available documents
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →