Skip to main content
CDMWindIndiaAMS-I.D

11.2 MW Wind Power project in Tamilnadu, by Amarjothi Group

CDM-1047 ↗

#1063of 1935 in Renewable energy#544of 975 in India#793of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)#344of 806 in AMS-I.D

5.0/ 10
Integrity
5.0
Transparency
4.5
Claim Safety
5.0
Documentation
5.5

Audit Analysis

A CDM wind power project (11.2 MW, Tamil Nadu) validated by TÜV NORD with a combined additionality test, but the additionality was not explicitly confirmed by the VVB in the extracted record. Significant contradictions exist between the validation report (2012) and the monitoring report (2022) on baseline method, total ERR, and crediting period, and eleven material findings with ten corrective actions were raised. The project delivered roughly 58% of the pro-rata ex-ante expectation, indicating conservative crediting but also raising questions about the accuracy of the original estimate.

Red Flags

  • Additionality test (combined) was not explicitly verified by the VVB in the extracted record, leaving a gap in the additionality chain of evidence.
  • Total ERR figures differ by a factor of 2.4 between the validation report (169,596 tCO₂e) and the monitoring report (70,761 tCO₂e), and the crediting period itself is stated differently (7 years vs 5 years), creating ambiguity about the true ex-ante expectation.
  • Baseline method is described as 'project' in the monitoring report but 'jurisdictional' in the validation report — a fundamental classification discrepancy that affects how the baseline is interpreted.
  • Eleven material findings were raised during verification, including an incorrect operating margin calculation (5-year vs required 3-year weighted average) that directly affects baseline emission estimates.

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2009
86,589086,589
2011
71,797071,797
2023
70,067070,067
Total228,4530228,453

Risk Indicators

Additionality

Combined test present but not explicitly VVB-confirmed

Permanence

Avoidance project, no reversal events, low inherent risk

Leakage

0% deduction, reasonable for grid-connected wind

Baseline

Method contradicts between docs; grid EF from 2009

Safeguards

Safeguards and benefit sharing mentioned; FPIC and grievance

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated in available documents

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-08-24AMS I.D

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents