Skip to main content
CDMHydroIndiaAMS-I.D

12 MW hydropower plant in Bhandardara in Maharashtra, India.

CDM-0430 ↗

#1202of 1935 in Renewable energy#628of 975 in India#917of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)#388of 806 in AMS-I.D

4.8/ 10
Integrity
4.5
Transparency
5.0
Claim Safety
5.5
Documentation
4.0

Audit Analysis

A 12 MW CDM hydropower project in Maharashtra, India, with a jurisdictional grid-emission-factor baseline and a combined additionality test, but undermined by a cluster of ten corrective-action requests and one compliance-level finding in the verification record, the absence of formal FPIC, and contradictory leakage and baseline characterisations across documents. The project delivered roughly 287 % of the pro-rata ex-ante expectation for the monitored period, suggesting a conservative baseline, yet the documentation quality and safeguard gaps limit confidence in the overall credit quality.

Red Flags

  • Formal FPIC was not conducted (validation report, 2016) despite the project's location in a populated area of Maharashtra; grievance mechanism is not stated in any available document.
  • Ten corrective-action requests (CAR#1–CAR#10) and one compliance-level finding (CL#1: missing UNFCCC renewal notification) were raised in the verification record, indicating material PDD and procedural deficiencies.
  • Leakage justification is contradictory: the 2016 validation report states leakage was 'deemed negligible' while the 2021 monitoring report records it as 'not addressed', leaving the 0 % deduction without a consistent evidentiary basis.
  • Grid emission factor of 0.689 tCO₂/MWh is drawn from the 2014 CEA database (CAR#3 notes the outdated v9 database was used), raising the question of whether the baseline reflects current grid conditions.

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2006
156,9270156,927
2008
46,090046,090
2009
11,137011,137
2011
57,123057,123
2013
59,254059,254
2016
63,160063,160
2017
42,996042,996
2018
39,849039,849
2021
54,024054,024
2022
48,934048,934
Total579,4940579,494

Risk Indicators

Additionality

Combined test present; VVB sign-off not explicitly confirmed

Permanence

no reversal events, but hydro-specifi

Leakage

0 % deduction; justification contradicted between validation

Baseline

Jurisdictional grid EF (2014 CEA); characterisation inconsis

Safeguards

Safeguards and benefit-sharing mentioned; FPIC not conducted

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP statuses not stated in any available document

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-08-24AMS-I.D.

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents