Skip to main content
UCRVillage Mandal Akhatwade Dhavlivihir Tane Isharde Tehsil Nandurbar Sakri District Nandurbar Dhulia State Maharashtra Country IndiaGeneral Methodologyv2.1

15 MW Wind Energy Project in Maharashtra

UCR-51 ↗

#1804of 1935 in Renewable energy#276of 433 in Universal Carbon Registry (UCR)

2.9/ 10
Integrity
3.5
Transparency
1.5
Claim Safety
4.0
Documentation
2.0

Audit Analysis

A 15 MW wind energy project in Maharashtra registered under the UCR standard with a jurisdictional baseline and a claimed 82,595 tCO2e over a roughly three-year crediting period. The available record consists solely of a Project Design Document; no verification report, monitoring report, or VVB assessment was found, leaving additionality, verified emissions reductions, and safeguards compliance unconfirmed. The project's inherent design (wind replacing grid electricity) is low-risk, but the documentation gap is severe.

Red Flags

  • No verification report or VVB assessment found in the available record; additionality is neither tested nor confirmed by an independent body
  • No verified emissions reduction figure exists to validate the claimed 82,595 tCO2e; the claim rests entirely on the PDD
  • CORSIA eligibility and CCP status are not stated, leaving dual-channel or double-claiming risk unassessed
  • Only a single document (PDD) was used for extraction; no monitoring report, verification report, or VVB report is available

Credit Vintages

Issuance data not yet available — check back soon.

Risk Indicators

Additionality

No additionality test or VVB confirmation found

Permanence

mixed evidence / unresolved risk

Leakage

0% deemed negligible, consistent with wind sector

Baseline

Jurisdictional method stated, reassessment timing not stated

Safeguards

Safeguards and benefit sharing mentioned; FPIC and grievance mechanism not detailed

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated; dual-channel risk unassessed

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-09-03General Methodology v2.1

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents