150 MW Grid Connected Wind Power Based Electricity Generation Project In Gujarat, India.
Score Breakdown
Integrity
verified Additionality was confirmed by the VVB, and the project used an investment test under ACM0002.
missing Leakage treatment is not addressed, and no buffer pool or reversal-risk detail is found in the extracted documents.
Transparency
verified The monitoring period and VVB name are stated, and claimed and verified ERs are identical at 281,410.
missing Meter calibration details, ongoing stakeholder communication, and usage-monitoring method are not stated in the available record.
Claim Safety
verified The project is explicitly not CORSIA-eligible, which lowers dual-market claim risk.
missing Leakage is not addressed, and the record shows a large emissions claim with contradictions on the credited amount across documents.
Documentation
verified A relatively large set of documents was used, and the extraction confidence is medium rather than low.
missing Several corrective actions were still required in the issuance record, including compliance declarations and missing monitoring details.
Detailed Analysis
Integrity
The verification record confirms additionality through an investment test and says the VVB, VKU Certification Pvt. Ltd., verified the project. This is a positive sign for baseline and additionality robustness, but leakage is explicitly not addressed and no buffer pool or reversal-event detail is available in the extracted record. Because this is a wind avoidance project, permanence risk is inherently lower than for removals, but the missing leakage treatment still weakens the score.
Transparency
The monitoring period is stated as 2022-01-01 to 2023-05-31, and the claimed and verified emission reductions both equal 281,410, which supports basic registry completeness. Still, the extracted documents do not state the usage-monitoring method, meter calibration details were requested as a corrective action, and the mechanism for ongoing stakeholder communication was also flagged as missing. Those gaps limit confidence in MRV transparency.
Claim Safety
Claim safety is helped by the fact that the project is explicitly not CORSIA-eligible, reducing the risk of overlapping aviation claims. However, leakage is not addressed, and the record contains a large emissions claim alongside contradictions in the credited amount across documents, which raises over-crediting concern. The baseline method is project-specific rather than a clearly recent standardized reassessment, so the claim is not especially conservative.
Documentation
The file set is fairly broad, with 42 documents used and medium extraction confidence, which is better than a sparse record. Even so, the issuance record still lists multiple corrective actions, including missing compliance declarations, stakeholder communication detail, meter calibration information, and cross-crediting-period parameter reporting. That indicates the documentation is usable but incomplete.
Overall
The project scores in the middle range because it has some strong elements — VVB-confirmed additionality, a registered VCS status, and matching claimed versus verified issuance in the latest record — but also meaningful weaknesses. I privileged the most recent issuance record for the 281,410 figure and the 2017-09-30 to 2027-09-29 crediting period because it is newer and more specific, while noting older documents in the contradictions list reported lower values and an earlier crediting period. The contradictions on leakage treatment, FPIC, safeguards, additionality test type, and ER totals reduce reliability and justify a downward adjustment.
Audit Analysis
This is a registered VCS wind project with VVB-confirmed additionality and no reported reversal events, which supports a moderate integrity profile. However, leakage is not addressed, several monitoring details are missing, and the record contains multiple contradictions that reduce confidence in the claims.
Project Description
This project aims to produce electricity using renewable wind power and feed it into the local grid in Gujarat. The project not only generates sustainable energy but also supports the commercialization of wind power in the region and contributes to the sustainable development of the community. It is a valuable effort towards mitigating climate change.
Red Flags
- Leakage is marked as not addressed, with no quantified deduction or supporting justification in the extracted record.
- The record contains contradictions on credited emissions, crediting period dates, safeguards, and additionality test type, which weakens reliability.
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 382,003 | 382,003 | 0 | |
| 2016 | 147,212 | 147,212 | 0 | |
| 2017 | 263,695 | 247,296 | 16,399 | |
| 2018 | 241,299 | 241,299 | 0 | |
| 2019 | 246,512 | 246,510 | 2 | |
| 2020 | 194,052 | 192,848 | 1,204 | |
| 2021 | 225,354 | 134,402 | 90,952 | |
| 2022 | 203,336 | 0 | 203,336 | |
| 2023 | 78,074 | 0 | 78,074 | |
| Total | 1,981,537 | 1,591,570 | 389,967 |
Cosa migliorerebbe questo punteggio
- Provide a clear leakage assessment with either a quantified deduction or a documented justification for why leakage is negligible.
- Resolve the document contradictions by reconciling the credited emissions, crediting period, safeguards, and additionality test across the issuance and earlier validation/verification records.
Questi suggerimenti indicano quali prove pubbliche aggiuntive potrebbero migliorare il livello di confidenza di questa valutazione. Non garantiscono un punteggio futuro più alto.
Risk Indicators
VVB-confirmed investment test
Avoidance project with no reversal events reported
Leakage not addressed
Project baseline stated, reassessment timing missing
Safeguards present but inconsistently documented
Not CORSIA-eligible; CCP status not stated
Where to buy
Marketplaces
+ Know where to buy this?
Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].
⚑ Dispute this rating
Sei il proprietario di questo progetto?
Correzione metadati (gratuita)
Nome, paese, marketplace o link errati? Segnalacelo.
Non modifica lo score.
[email protected] →Rivalutazione con nuovi documenti
Hai documentazione aggiornata non ancora inclusa? Puoi richiedere un nuovo run della pipeline con i nuovi input.
Invia Documenti →