Skip to main content
ACRForest CarbonOHIO, USGeneral Methodologyv2.1

18 Reserves Forest Carbon Project

ACR-586 ↗

#30of 145 in REDD+#93of 389 in United States#43of 195 in American Carbon Registry (ACR)

5.8/ 10
Integrity
5.5
Transparency
5.5
Claim Safety
7.0
Documentation
5.0

Audit Analysis

The 18 Reserves Forest Carbon Project is a well-structured ACR forest carbon project with a verified combined additionality test, a 20% buffer pool, and a highly conservative 40% leakage deduction. However, the verification report identified 33 material findings and 18 corrective actions—many administrative but several substantive (calculation errors, missing ESIA sections, outdated template)—which significantly erode confidence in the reporting quality. The project over-delivers relative to its ex-ante estimate, which is a positive for claim safety, but the project-specific baseline and gaps in safeguards documentation (FPIC not conducted, ESIA incomplete) limit overall integrity.

Red Flags

  • 33 material findings in the 2025 verification report, including incorrect Net ERR calculation (buffer deduction not applied), Equation 5 miscalculation, and mislabeled with-project uncertainty
  • FPIC not conducted and ESIA Report initially missing with Labor Rights, Human Rights, and Gender Equality sections marked out of scope
  • Monitoring Report used outdated ACR template version 3 instead of version 4, and was dated before the end of the reporting period
  • Crediting period dates were inconsistent between the GHG Plan and the Monitoring Report

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2020
160,99497,23663,758
2021
141,41420,933120,481
2022
137,18530,630106,555
2023
110,7760110,776
Total550,369148,799401,570

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed combined test

Permanence

20% buffer pool, no reversals

Leakage

40% quantified deduction

Baseline

Project-specific, no reassessment date

Safeguards

Grievance present, FPIC absent, ESIA gaps

Double-claim

CORSIA/CCP status not stated

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-09-12General Methodology v2.1

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents