Top ACR-IFM-US projects
194 rated projects in this methodology · average score 4.3/10 · ranked by CarbonMeld's document-based assessment scores across all four dimensions: integrity, transparency, claim safety and documentation. Showing the top 50 — filter the full table for the rest.
What you're looking at
This page ranks projects using ACR-IFM-US by their CarbonMeld document-based assessment scores. The rank compares project assessments; it is not a rating of the methodology itself.
CarbonMeld scores assess integrity, transparency, claim safety and documentation using project documents. Higher scores indicate stronger evidence under this framework. How to read CarbonMeld scores.
Project names, codes and registry status come from official registry records. Open a project dossier for its source record. Registry / standard: ACR .
ACR-IFM-US: Improved Forest Management (IFM) on Non-Federal U.S. Forestlands
Methodology issuer: ACR · Official methodology page.
Forestry · Emission reductions and CO2 removals
The methodology credits the additional carbon kept in forests on non-federal land in the United States when landowners manage them to a higher standard than intensive harvesting or selling off the timberland would allow.
Version 2.1 · Active at ACR · status verified on
Version and status refer to the methodology at its issuer. Individual projects may use different versions; these facts do not establish credit eligibility in other programs.
ICVCM CCP: approved programs and versions
- ACR · version(s) 1.3 · Official CCP decision listing · verified
- ACR · version(s) 2.0 · Official CCP decision listing · verified
- ACR · version(s) 2.1 · Official CCP decision listing · verified
Approval applies to the programs and versions listed. The official decision and project-specific conditions must also be met for credits to carry a CCP label; this is not a label for the projects on this page.
- 47.1
- 57.1
- 67.1
- 77
- 86.9▲+0.6
- 96.9
- 106.9
- 116.9
- 126.8
- 136.8
- 146.8
- 156.8
- 166.8
- 176.8
- 186.7
- 196.7
- 206.7
- 216.7
- 226.7
- 236.6
- 246.6
- 256.6
- 266.5
- 276.5
- 286.5
- 296.5
- 306.5
- 316.5
- 326.4
- 336.4▲+4.9
- 346.4
- 356.4
- 366.4
- 376.3
- 386.2
- 396.2▲+0.6
- 406.2
- 416.2
- 426.2▼-1.2
- 436.2▼-0.1
- 446.1
- 456.1
- 466
- 476▲+4.5
- 486
- 496
- 506
Rank is by document-based assessment score only. The registry status shown next to each project is a separate fact: inclusion in this ranking is not a statement of current validity or credit eligibility — projects suspended, withdrawn or terminated by their registry can still appear, with their status labelled. Read the methodology.