4.5 MW Industrial Waste based Grid-connected Power Project
#123of 352 in Biomass#634of 975 in India#921of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)#390of 806 in AMS-I.D
Audit Analysis
This CDM biomass power project in India has a VVB-confirmed additionality assessment and a reputable verifier (DNV), but suffers from significant data contradictions across documents—most critically a 7.6× discrepancy between the ex-ante emissions estimate and the monitoring-period claim, a baseline-method conflict, and a grid emission factor mismatch. No buffer pool, permanence mechanism, or verified ERR figure is stated, and key MRV parameters (FNRB, usage monitoring) are absent from the record.
Red Flags
- The monitoring report claims 53,374 tCO₂ for a ~3.5-year period while the validation report's ex-ante estimate is only 20,049 tCO₂ for the full 10-year crediting period, implying the project delivered roughly 7.6× the pro-rata expectation—an extreme over-delivery that raises serious over-crediting concerns.
- Baseline method is stated as 'project-specific' in the monitoring report but 'jurisdictional' in the validation report, a fundamental contradiction that undermines confidence in the baseline.
- No buffer pool, permanence mechanism, or reversal-risk treatment is stated in any available document, leaving the project's permanence unaddressed.
- Grid emission factor differs between the PDD (739.14 kgCO₂/MWh) and the validation report (0.795 tCO₂/MWh ≈ 795 kgCO₂/MWh), a ~7.6% discrepancy that affects the baseline calculation.
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | 53,107 | 0 | 53,107 | |
| Total | 53,107 | 0 | 53,107 |
Risk Indicators
VVB-confirmed combined test
mixed evidence / unresolved risk
0% deduction; justification inconsistent across documents
Method contradicts between documents; project-specific per m
Safeguards mentioned; FPIC and grievance mechanism not state
CORSIA and CCP status not stated
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →