Skip to main content
CDMBiomass EnergyIndiaAMS-I.C

5 MW Biomass based Cogeneration project” at Solan, Himachal Pradesh, by M/s Deepak Spinners Limited

CDM-1461 ↗

#208of 352 in Biomass#830of 975 in India#1267of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)#67of 115 in AMS-I.C

4.2/ 10
Integrity
5.0
Transparency
3.5
Claim Safety
4.0
Documentation
3.5

Audit Analysis

A 5 MW biomass cogeneration project in Himachal Pradesh, India, validated under CDM AMS I.C. v10 with a confirmed barrier-based additionality test by TÜV SÜD. However, the project record is undermined by three material contradictions between the PDD and validation report (ERR magnitude, baseline method, and leakage treatment), ten corrective actions, and a near-total absence of monitoring or post-validation data. The project's crediting period ended in 2017, and no verified emissions reductions have been documented in the available record.

Red Flags

  • Ten-fold discrepancy in claimed ERR between the PDD (265,720 tCO₂e) and the validation report (26,572 tCO₂e) — likely a typographical error but a serious data-integrity issue
  • Leakage treatment contradicts between documents: the PDD states leakage is 'deemed negligible' while the validation report records it as 'not addressed', with a 0% deduction and no quantified justification
  • Baseline method is inconsistent: the PDD describes a jurisdictional baseline while the validation report characterises it as project-specific
  • Ten corrective actions were required at validation, including debundling concerns (Pagara project), methodology alignment, and grid emission factor recalculation
  • No monitoring reports, verified ERR, or post-validation data are present in the extracted record despite the crediting period ending in 2017

Credit Vintages

No issuances recorded on the registry.

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed barrier test (first-of-its-kind)

Permanence

mixed evidence / unresolved risk

Leakage

0% deduction with contradictory justification across documen

Baseline

Project-specific baseline; method contradicts PDD

Safeguards

Safeguards mentioned but no FPIC or grievance mechanism docu

Double-claim

CCP and CORSIA status not stated in available documents

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-08-25AMS I.C.

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents