5 MW Dehar Grid-connected SHP in Himachal Pradesh, India
#28of 770 in Renewable energy#15of 387 in India#2of 213 in CDM (UNFCCC)#7of 417 in AMS-I.D
Audit Analysis
A 5 MW grid-connected small hydro project in Himachal Pradesh, India, verified by DNV under CDM AMS-I.D v16, with a common-practice additionality test and a jurisdictional baseline. The project delivered approximately 95% of its pro-rata ex-ante expectation over the full 7-year crediting period, indicating conservative crediting. Minor gaps exist in MRV detail documentation and one source document is unidentified, but no material compliance issues remain outstanding.
Red Flags
- Leakage deduction is 0% with only a 'deemed negligible' justification and no quantified analysis; while reasonable for a grid-connected hydro, the absence of a documented quantification is a minor gap.
- One of the five source documents is listed as 'unknown' in the evidence record, reducing traceability of the full documentation chain.
- The additionality test type is inconsistent between the PDD (investment test) and the validation report (common-practice test), creating ambiguity about which test was actually applied.
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 23,649 | 0 | 23,649 | |
| 2008 | 31,155 | 0 | 31,155 | |
| 2010 | 16,065 | 0 | 16,065 | |
| 2011 | 11,034 | 0 | 11,034 | |
| 2012 | 22,971 | 0 | 22,971 | |
| Total | 104,874 | 0 | 104,874 |
Risk Indicators
VVB-confirmed common-practice test
Avoidance project, no reversal risk
0% deduction, qualitative justification only
Jurisdictional grid EF, standardised
Safeguards mentioned, FPIC/grievance not detailed
CDM credits, no CORSIA/CCP channel
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →