Skip to main content
CDMWindIndiaACM0002

56.25 MW bundled wind energy project in Tirunelveli and Coimbatore districts in Tamilnadu, India.

CDM-0471 ↗

#1293of 1935 in Renewable energy#688of 975 in India#1011of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)#1005of 1287 in ACM0002

4.7/ 10
Integrity
5.0
Transparency
4.5
Claim Safety
4.0
Documentation
5.5

Audit Analysis

A 56.25 MW bundled wind project in Tamil Nadu, India, verified by SGS United Kingdom under CDM methodology ACM0002. The project uses a jurisdictional baseline and an investment additionality test, both appropriate for wind, but the verification report identified seven material findings requiring corrective action, and significant contradictions exist between the PDD, monitoring report, and verification report on ERR figures, baseline method, and crediting period. The 0% leakage deduction is reasonable for grid-displacing wind, but multiple key safety indicators remain unquantified in the available record.

Red Flags

  • The PDD reports a total ERR of 544,897 while the verification report confirms only 58,497 for the monitoring period — a roughly 9-fold discrepancy that raises serious over-crediting concerns until resolved
  • Seven material findings were raised during verification, including inconsistencies in meter numbers, commissioning dates, geo-coordinates, project boundary definition, and an outdated grid emission factor, all requiring corrective action
  • The monitoring report describes the baseline as 'project-specific' while the verification report classifies it as 'jurisdictional' — an unresolved methodological contradiction that affects baseline validity
  • The monitoring report states a crediting period starting in 2002 while the verification report and PDD indicate 2009 — a 7-year discrepancy that affects the pro-rata ERR expectation

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2007
127,7260127,726
2008
56,804056,804
2009
51,804051,804
2011
74,652074,652
2012
54,138054,138
2013
58,497058,497
Total423,6210423,621

Risk Indicators

Additionality

Investment test present but VVB confirmation not explicitly

Permanence

Avoidance-type wind project with no reversal events reported

Leakage

0% deduction with 'deemed negligible' justification, consist

Baseline

Jurisdictional baseline per verification report, but contrad

Safeguards

Safeguards mentioned and benefit sharing described, but FPIC

Double-claim

CORSIA eligibility and CCP status not stated in available do

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-08-25ACM0002

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents