Skip to main content
CDMWindIndiaGeneral Methodologyv2.1

6.75 MW Small Scale Grid Connected “Wind Electricity Generation Project” by Tamil Nadu Newsprint and Papers Limited

CDM-1053 ↗

#637of 975 in India#923of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)

4.8/ 10
Integrity
5.0
Transparency
4.5
Claim Safety
4.5
Documentation
5.0

Audit Analysis

A 6.75 MW CDM wind project in India verified by DNV, with VVB-confirmed additionality via a combined test, but undermined by a project-specific baseline, an unaddressed leakage justification, a metering discrepancy (five meters versus four registered), and nine corrective actions raised during verification. The project is an avoidance-type wind installation with no reversal risk, yet the accumulation of material findings and documentation gaps limits confidence in the robustness of the credit claims.

Red Flags

  • Leakage deduction of 0% with justification recorded as 'not addressed' in the 2014 monitoring report, contradicting the 2007 validation report's 'deemed negligible' position
  • Metering discrepancy: seven wind generators connected through five meters instead of the four specified in the registered PDD, flagged during the fourth verification
  • Additionality justification under prevailing practices was initially unsupported by valid arguments (CAR 1), requiring revision to emphasise investment barriers
  • Baseline emission factors were not updated with the latest CEA data at the time of validation (CL 3), and no baseline reassessment date is recorded
  • Stakeholder consultation records were not available during the site visit (CL 5), and FPIC was not conducted

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2007
45,584045,584
2008
11,462011,462
2010
11,321011,321
2011
11,679011,679
2012
17,362017,362
2015
16,783016,783
Total114,1910114,191

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-verified combined test, but prevailing-practices argumen

Permanence

Wind avoidance project; no reversal risk or events reported

Leakage

0% deduction with justification recorded as 'not addressed'

Baseline

Project-specific baseline; EFs not updated at validation; no

Safeguards

Safeguards mentioned and benefit sharing described, but FPIC

Double-claim

CCP and CORSIA eligibility both unknown; dual-channel risk c

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-08-25General Methodology v2.1

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents