Skip to main content
CDMHydroIndiaAMS-I.D

650 KW Terkiana Mini Hydel Project on Holybein

CDM-5068 ↗

#856of 975 in India#1319of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)#521of 806 in AMS-I.D

4.1/ 10
Integrity
3.5
Transparency
4.0
Claim Safety
4.5
Documentation
5.0

Audit Analysis

This 650 kW mini-hydro CDM project in India was validated by TÜV NORD CERT with an investment additionality test, but the validation report contains 22 material findings that seriously question the financial assumptions underpinning additionality (inflated project costs, excessive ROE, non-conforming tariffs). The monitoring record covers only three months of the ten-year crediting period, no verified ERR figure is available, and the grid emission factor dates from 2009. Multiple contradictions across documents—including the baseline method, crediting period start date, and the claimed ERR—undermine confidence in the project's data integrity.

Red Flags

  • 22 material findings in the validation report question the investment additionality test, including project cost at Rs.122 mn/MW (more than double CERC's Rs.50 mn benchmark) and ROE above 25% versus the 14% CERC recommendation, suggesting the financial case may have been constructed to demonstrate non-viability
  • The claimed ERR of 1,043 tCO2e contradicts a figure of 33,129 tCO2e within the same monitoring report (2021), a 32-fold discrepancy that cannot be reconciled without further documentation
  • The baseline method is recorded as 'jurisdictional' in the monitoring report but 'project-specific' in the validation report, creating uncertainty about which baseline was actually applied
  • The grid emission factor of 0.84 tCO2/kWh is sourced from 2009, more than a decade before the monitoring report date, and the validation report explicitly flagged that it needed correction to a generation-weighted three-year average
  • No verified ERR figure is available in the extracted record, and the monitoring period covers only three months (Oct–Dec 2012) of the ten-year crediting period

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2022
29,421029,421
Total29,421029,421

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-verified but 22 findings challenge financial assumptions

Permanence

low inherent risk for hydro

Leakage

0% deduction, deemed negligible – reasonable for hydro

Baseline

Method contradicts across docs; grid EF from 2009

Safeguards

Mentioned but no FPIC, grievance mechanism, or detail found

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated in available documents

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-08-25AMS-I.D

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents