Skip to main content
CDMHydroChinaACM0002

65MW Dagushan hydropower Project in China

CDM-3045 ↗

#1446of 1935 in Renewable energy#903of 1084 in China#1181of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)#1110of 1287 in ACM0002

4.4/ 10
Integrity
4.5
Transparency
4.0
Claim Safety
4.5
Documentation
4.5

Audit Analysis

The 65 MW Dagushan hydropower project is a CDM generation project with a jurisdictional baseline and a reputable VVB (TÜV NORD CERT), but the extracted record contains four material contradictions between the validation report and an undated appendix, including a factor-of-two discrepancy in the grid emission factor. No monitoring-report data, FNRB values, or additionality test details were found in the available documents, and two material findings (one an EF calculation error) required corrective action. The project's inherent low permanence risk as a hydro generation project partially offsets these documentation and baseline uncertainties.

Red Flags

  • Grid emission factor differs by a factor of two between the validation report (0.4735) and an undated appendix (0.9457), creating material uncertainty in the baseline and therefore in the 646,821 tCO₂e lifetime claim.
  • The validation report records a material finding that Step 1 of the EFgrid,CM,y calculation was incorrect regarding electricity imported to NWPG (CAR 2), indicating the baseline was initially miscalculated.
  • No monitoring-report data (verified ERR, FNRB, usage monitoring) was found in the extracted record despite the project having operated since 2017.
  • Additionality test type and VVB confirmation are not stated in the available documents, leaving the additionality assessment unverifiable from the extracted record.

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2012
196,4250196,425
2013
232,8590232,859
Total429,2840429,284

Risk Indicators

Additionality

Test type not stated in available documents

Permanence

Hydro generation – low inherent reversal risk

Leakage

0 % deduction, justification contradicted by appendix

Baseline

Jurisdictional per VVB, but EF contradiction and CAR 2 error

Safeguards

Safeguards mentioned; FPIC and grievance mechanism not state

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated in available documents

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-08-25ACM0002

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents