Skip to main content
CDMWindIndiaGeneral Methodologyv2.1

7.25 MW wind energy project of Aruppukottai Sri Jayavilas Ltd, Tamilnadu, India

CDM-1137 ↗

#1074of 1935 in Renewable energy#555of 975 in India#798of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)

5.0/ 10
Integrity
4.5
Transparency
5.5
Claim Safety
5.0
Documentation
5.5

Audit Analysis

A 7.25 MW CDM wind project in Tamil Nadu, India, with a standard grid-emission-factor baseline and smart-meter monitoring. The project is undermined by a critical contradiction in the VVB's additionality verification across two validation reports, a grid emission factor discrepancy (0.93 vs 0.82), and under-delivery of roughly 38% against the pro-rata expectation for the monitored period. No reversal risk exists for this avoidance-type project, and leakage treatment is appropriate.

Red Flags

  • The 2009 validation report (SGS UK) states additionality was NOT verified by the VVB, directly contradicting the 2007 validation report which confirmed it — a fundamental CDM requirement in question.
  • Grid emission factor appears as both 0.93 and 0.82 across monitoring reports, a 13% discrepancy that materially affects credit quantities.
  • The project delivered only ~62% of the pro-rata ERR expectation for the monitored period (14,849 vs ~23,970 tCO₂e), suggesting the PDD lifetime estimate of 93,317 tCO₂e may be optimistic.
  • Baseline method is described as 'project' in the 2013 monitoring report but 'jurisdictional' in the 2007 validation report — an inconsistency in a core methodological parameter.
  • No grievance mechanism and no FPIC process documented, despite safeguards being mentioned in the monitoring report.

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2009
12,296012,296
2010
14,763014,763
2011
14,941014,941
Total42,000042,000

Risk Indicators

Additionality

Combined test present but VVB verification contradicted acro

Permanence

Avoidance project, no reversal risk or events

Leakage

0% deduction with quantified justification, sector-appropria

Baseline

Grid EF baseline but method label contradicted; EF from 2005

Safeguards

Mentioned in monitoring report but absent from validation; n

Double-claim

CORSIA excluded but CCP status not stated

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-08-25General Methodology v2.1

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents