Skip to main content
VCSEnergy industries (renewable/non-renewable sources)India Registry: RegisteredAMS-I.D

8.3 MW Wind Electricity Generation Project by Parakh Agro Industries Limited in Dhule, Maharashtra

VCS-195 ↗

#623of 975 in India#824of 1339 in Verra (VCS)#385of 806 in AMS-I.D

4.8/ 10
Integrity
5.0
Transparency
4.5
Claim Safety
5.5
Documentation
3.5

Audit Analysis

A straightforward 8.3 MW wind energy project under the well-established AMS-I.D methodology with VVB-confirmed additionality, but the verification record is marred by five material findings, eight corrective actions, and nine contradictions between the 2010 and 2025 verification reports. Data quality issues around parameter discrepancies, methodology version inconsistencies (v14 vs v17 vs v18), and calibration gaps significantly undermine confidence in the reported 90,089 tCO₂e. The project is not CORSIA-eligible and presents no reversal risk, but the documentation and data integrity concerns limit its overall quality.

Red Flags

  • Five material findings in the 2025 verification report, including discrepancies in ex-ante vs monitored parameters (grid EF, capacity factor, net energy) and methodology version inconsistencies (v14 vs v17 vs v18)
  • Eight corrective actions required, including missing calibration certificates, incorrect generation data for two 1.65 MW turbines, and excluded pre-2006 generation data
  • Nine contradictions between the 2010 and 2025 verification reports spanning ERR figures, baseline method, safeguards, FPIC, grievance mechanism, and crediting period start date
  • Low extraction confidence across the document set, indicating at least one key document was poorly readable

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2006
44,81944,8190
2009
7,21407,214
2010
13,128013,128
2011
13,196013,196
2012
14,308014,308
2013
14,701014,701
2014
13,161013,161
2015
12,712012,712
2016
1,66901,669
Total134,90844,81990,089

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed investment test

Permanence

Avoidance project, no reversals

Leakage

0% deduction, justification inconsistent across reports

Baseline

Method contradiction: project vs jurisdictional

Safeguards

FPIC and grievance present but absent in 2010 report

Double-claim

Not CORSIA-eligible, CCP not stated

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-09-01AMS-I.D, Grid connected renewable electricity Generation

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents