Afforestation of Degraded Grasslands in Vichada, Colombia
Score Breakdown
Integrity
verified VVB confirmation of additionality by TÜV SÜD America, Inc (verification report, 2025-02-05)
missing numerous material findings and 18 CARs plus reversal events described as not addressed (verification report, 2025-02-05)
Transparency
verified monitoring period provided (2020-12-04 — 2022-11-08) and VVB named in the verification report
missing key MRV outputs missing from extracted record: total ERR claimed/verified and detailed ERR calculation spreadsheet requested by the VVB
Claim Safety
missing project is CORSIA-eligible (extracted record) which increases dual-claim risk
inferred inconsistent ERR reporting and a required ex-post ERR spreadsheet create over-crediting uncertainty (VVB requests)
Documentation
verified 32 documents used and recent reassessment of baseline/non-permanence in 2023 mentioned
missing evidence source names are largely unknown in the extract and extraction confidence is medium; many CARs indicate outstanding data corrections required
Detailed Analysis
Integrity
The verification report (2025-02-05) confirms additionality (combined test) and the project holds an 18% buffer pool contribution, which are positive for permanence and additionality. However, the verification record lists many material findings including 18 Corrective Action Requests and explicit requirements to correct ERR calculations and non‑permanence monitoring; reversal events are flagged as not addressed in the latest extracted facts. The baseline is project-specific rather than jurisdictional which reduces robustness. These unresolved findings and the lack of clear reversal resolution materially depress integrity.
Transparency
A named VVB (TÜV SÜD America, Inc) and a clear monitoring period are present in the verification report, and the baseline was reassessed in 2023, which supports transparency. Crucial outputs are missing in the extracted record: total ERR claimed and verified are not provided, the ex-post ERR calculation spreadsheet is explicitly requested by the VVB, and evidence document names are largely unknown. Min extraction confidence is medium, so some documents may have been poorly read.
Claim Safety
The project is listed as CORSIA-eligible in the extracted facts, which raises dual-claim risk; CCP status is not stated. The verification report requires corrected and consistent net GHG ERR calculations for the monitoring period (2020–2022), indicating potential over‑crediting risk until those ERRs are verified and reconciled. The lack of published ERR figures and the VVB’s CARs increase claim uncertainty.
Documentation
Documentation breadth is reasonable (32 documents used) and the verification report is recent (2025-02-05). Nonetheless, evidence_docs entries are 'unknown', min_extraction_confidence is medium, and many corrective actions are outstanding — the VVB required multiple monitoring report updates and data items (KML, ERR spreadsheets, LTA calculations). These gaps and the medium extraction confidence reduce the documentation score.
Overall
I privileged the later, more recent statements where contradictions exist: the entries dated 2024-11-26 indicating a quantified leakage justification, a combined additionality test, and reversals described as not addressed were given precedence over earlier/older values (2024-11-18 and 2022-03-01). The reason is recency and consistency with the 2025 verification report which references a re-evaluation using the AFOLU NPRT v4.2 (Oct 12, 2023) and lists outstanding CARs. The contradictions (leakage quantified vs earlier deemed negligible; combined additionality vs earlier investment-only; reversal events not addressed vs earlier reported) indicate instability in the documented record and lower confidence in results — scores were adjusted downward to reflect these reliability issues. Overall score (4.2) reflects moderate weaknesses driven by unresolved corrective actions, inconsistencies in ERR reporting, and CORSIA eligibility risk.
Audit Analysis
The project shows some positive integrity elements (VVB confirmation of additionality, 18% buffer) but is weakened by many corrective actions, unresolved reversal treatment, and internal data inconsistencies. Documentation and MRV are partial: a named VVB and monitoring period are present, but key ERR figures and some monitoring methods are not provided. CORSIA eligibility and reported inconsistencies raise claim-risk and over‑crediting concerns.
Project Description
The Afforestation of degraded grasslands in Vichada, Colombia (VCS ID: 2512) is a large-scale grouped project that aims to restore degraded grasslands by establishing commercial timber plantations. The project is located in the municipalities of Puerto Carreño and La Primavera in the Vichada department of Colombia, a region historically characterized by low-fertility soils degraded by unmanaged cattle grazing and frequent fires. The primary activity involves planting fast-growing tree species, mainly Eucalyptus pellita and Acacia mangium, as well as improved Eucalyptus hybrids. Initially focused on producing wood chips for biomass energy, the project has expanded its commercial scope to include treated fence posts and industrial lumber, enhancing its long-term financial viability. Environmental Benefits: The project's main climate benefit is the removal of significant amounts of atmospheric CO2, sequestering it in the growing biomass of the plantations. Over its 30-year crediting period, it is estimated to remove an average of 98,588 tonnes of CO2e per year. By converting degraded grasslands back to forested land, the project also aims to improve soil health, restore hydrological functions, and promote connectivity between remaining patches of natural ecosystems, such as native forests and "morichales" (palm swamps). Specific biodiversity monitoring of flora and fauna is conducted to serve as a baseline for measuring long-term positive impacts. Social and Community Benefits: Located in a region historically affected by poverty and limited economic opportunities, the project provides significant local employment. It has created over 100 full-time jobs, with a commitment to gender equality, ensuring at least 20% of positions are held by women. The project provides regular training for its workers on topics ranging from technical skills to workplace safety and biodiversity conservation. Beyond direct employment, the project supports local communities by providing ec
Red Flags
- 18 Corrective Action Requests and numerous findings in the verification record
- Contradictory statements on leakage, additionality test type, and reversal events; net GHG ERRs not consistently reported
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 5,772 | 5,772 | 0 | |
| 2018 | 177,118 | 177,118 | 0 | |
| 2019 | 321,516 | 319,972 | 1,544 | |
| 2020 | 101,077 | 6,282 | 94,795 | |
| 2021 | 63,730 | 51,103 | 12,627 | |
| 2022 | 52,598 | 7,283 | 45,315 | |
| Total | 721,811 | 567,530 | 154,281 |
Cosa migliorerebbe questo punteggio
- Publish and reconcile the ex-post ERR calculation spreadsheet (with formulas and data sources) and release total ERR claimed and verified for the monitoring period.
- Resolve all outstanding Corrective Action Requests, explicitly document how reversal risks are being monitored/managed, and provide signed evidence for updates (KML, LTA calculations, and clarified leakage justification).
Questi suggerimenti indicano quali prove pubbliche aggiuntive potrebbero migliorare il livello di confidenza di questa valutazione. Non garantiscono un punteggio futuro più alto.
Risk Indicators
VVB‑confirmed
buffer present but reversals unresolved
quantified but deduction 0% / inconsistent
project baseline (reassessed 2023)
FPIC & grievance present
CORSIA-eligible — dual risk
Where to buy
Marketplaces
+ Know where to buy this?
Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].
⚑ Dispute this rating
Registry Documents
issuance
monitoring
Other
pdd
validation
- CCB_VCS_Verification_Report_Vichada_CCBv3.0_VCSv3.4 10052022 .pdf
- 4_Verification-Representation FFC2V-v4.2 (1).pdf
- CCB_VCS_Verification_Report-FFCv.1.5-clean.pdf
- VCSVerificationRepresentationVICHADA10052022.pdf
- VCSValidationRepresentationv4.1Vichada10052022.pdf
- CCBVerification Statement Vichada10052022.pdf
- +3 more
Sei il proprietario di questo progetto?
Correzione metadati (gratuita)
Nome, paese, marketplace o link errati? Segnalacelo.
Non modifica lo score.
[email protected] →Rivalutazione con nuovi documenti
Hai documentazione aggiornata non ancora inclusa? Puoi richiedere un nuovo run della pipeline con i nuovi input.
Invia Documenti →